The encyclopedia · People & Management · Operational decision · 2023–2026
OpenText bought Micro Focus for $5.8B — and has cut ~5% of staff every year since.
A $5.8B acquisition became a three-year optimization plan: 1,200 jobs cut in 2024, 1,600 in 2025, ~880 in 2026 — ~5% a year, recast by the CEO as an AI pivot.
OpenText · 2025-05
What happened
On 31 January 2023 OpenText, the Waterloo, Ontario software group, closed its acquisition of Micro Focus for about $5.8 billion, a deal that bundled in Micro Focus's cash and debt and made OpenText one of the largest enterprise-software companies in the world. Buying a rival that size is a multi-year task: the two product lines, workforces and cost bases have to be merged. OpenText's name for that task is a three-year "business optimization programme."
The programme has run, above all, on headcount. Chief executive Mark Barrenechea kicked it off in 2024 by cutting 1,200 employees; in May 2025 the company cut another 1,600 jobs; and in early 2026 roughly 880 more went. That is about 5 percent of the workforce removed every year for three years — a cadence employees have taken to calling a "yearly spring cleaning." Barrenechea told staff that embracing AI was a "number one priority and baseline expectation," framing the cuts as a pivot toward AI, cloud and security rather than mere cost-cutting.
The promised payoff is large: OpenText has said the optimisation will generate annual savings of roughly $490 million to $550 million. The recurring cuts, though, are the tell. A company that must reduce its staff by 5 percent every year is not fixing a one-time overlap from an acquisition; it is running restructuring as a standing operation. The acquisition bought revenue and scale; the optimization is the long, repeated bill for digesting it.
The decision error sits one layer back from the layoffs. Growth by large acquisition lets a company buy revenue quickly, but the integration cost — the redundant roles, the overlapping tools, the debt it took on — arrives in instalments over years. OpenText's annual 5 percent cuts are those instalments. The lesson is not that acquisitions fail; it is that the price quoted at closing is not the whole price, and a workforce cut every spring is a sign the real one is still being paid.
Why it happened
- The acquisition's cost arrived in instalments. A $5.8B deal keeps costing after closing; redundant roles and overlapping cost bases must be cut over years, and the yearly layoffs are that removal.
- Restructuring became routine. Cutting ~5% of staff every spring turns restructuring from an event into a standing operation, unsettling the workforce and signalling the integration is never finished.
- The AI pivot doubled as the rationale. Framing the cuts as a move toward AI, cloud and security let the company cast cost reduction as strategy, but the savings target shows the cost motive beneath.
- Buying revenue is faster than building it. Acquisition delivered scale immediately; the trade-off is that the company now spends years paying for and integrating what it bought instead of growing it.
The lesson
The closing price is not the whole price of an acquisition. The integration cost arrives in years of instalments — and if you are cutting staff every spring, the real bill is still being paid.
Aftermath
OpenText has said the optimization will save $490 million to $550 million a year, and Barrenechea has cast the company's future as an AI-focused information-management business. Whether three springs of 5 percent cuts produce that business, or simply a smaller one, is the open question the programme leaves. For other acquirers the case is a ledger warning: count the integration — the roles, the overlap, the years it takes — into the price before you sign, because the workforce will be the line item that pays it.
Sources
- OpenText closes acquisition of Micro Focus (exhibit) — SEC EDGAR
- OpenText Buys Micro Focus — OpenText press release
- OpenText employees report job cuts tied to apparent restructuring — BetaKit
- OpenText layoffs: full history (4 rounds) — LayoffCheck
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Lightspeed replaced its founder after a short-seller crash, then undid it 26 months later
Shopify bet the pandemic e-commerce boom was permanent — then laid off 3,000 people
A 75,000-character resignation letter cost DingTalk's CEO his job in 8 days
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.