Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · People & Management · Operational decision · 2023

Spotify hired too fast during the pandemic — then cut 17% of staff in one day

The Swedish streamer tripled its podcast bet and expanded headcount quickly. In 2023 it made three rounds of cuts, with the last removing 1,500 roles.

Spotify · 2023-12-04

What happened

Spotify grew rapidly through the pandemic, adding staff and spending roughly $1 billion to acquire podcast studios, exclusive shows and related technology. CEO Daniel Ek later said the company had hired too many people and too fast during 2020 and 2021, when low interest rates and stay-at-home demand made aggressive expansion look cheap.

The correction began in January 2023 with a 6% reduction, followed by a smaller cut in June. On 4 December 2023, Ek announced the largest reduction: 17% of the workforce, about 1,500 people. He told employees the company needed to 'rightsize' and become more efficient, and that many talented people had been hired for work that was no longer essential.

The layoffs came even as Spotify's user numbers and revenue continued to grow. The mismatch was not between demand and the product; it was between the cost base built during the boom and the profitability expected after it ended.

Why it happened

  • Hiring was set by pandemic-era growth assumptions rather than by durable revenue per employee
  • The podcast-acquisition spree created parallel teams and content costs that outran the ad revenue they could monetise
  • Each round of cuts was described as the last, until a larger one was needed six months later
  • The company waited until after overstaffing became a margin problem rather than correcting hiring velocity in real time
What it cost~2,300 jobs lost in 2023; morale and trust hitcostly

The lesson

Hiring velocity is a leading indicator. If you need repeated 'right-sizing' rounds, the first round was not right-sizing — it was the start of admitting the hiring plan was wrong.

Aftermath

Spotify returned to profitability in 2024 and its share price recovered, but the case became a standard example of pandemic-era overhiring in tech. Daniel Ek publicly acknowledged that the layoffs were more disruptive than expected and that the company had to rebuild trust with remaining staff.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →