Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2023

Air France claimed it let people 'travel better and sustainably' — the ASA banned the ads

The airline did not even send a substantive response to the ASA investigation. An AI system the watchdog built had flagged the ads automatically.

Air France · 2023-12-06

What happened

Air France ran advertising claiming it was 'committed to protecting the environment' and enabled customers to 'travel better and sustainably'. The ASA's AI-powered monitoring system flagged the ads as potential greenwashing, and the watchdog opened an investigation alongside parallel cases against Lufthansa and Etihad.

On 6 December 2023, the ASA banned the Air France ads. It found that the claim 'travel better and sustainably' would lead consumers to believe the airline offered a sustainable and environmentally friendly way to travel by air. That impression, the ASA said, 'was not true'. Air travel produced high levels of both CO2 and non-CO2 emissions making a substantial contribution to climate change.

Air France did not provide a substantive response to the ASA's investigation and did not respond to the BBC's request for comment. The ASA noted the airline's silence in its ruling. The ads were banned from appearing again in the complained-about form.

Why it happened

  • The word 'sustainably' was used without qualification in an industry where no commercial flight is sustainable by any standard definition
  • Air France did not engage with the investigation, forfeiting the chance to argue context or add qualifying information
  • The ASA's new AI monitoring system meant the ads were caught proactively, not through a competitor or advocacy complaint
  • The ruling came alongside Lufthansa and Etihad, signalling a sector-wide enforcement stance rather than a one-off
What it costads banned; no defence enteredembarrassing

The lesson

Regulators now use automated scanning to find greenwashing — an airline that does not respond to an investigation gets a ruling written entirely from the complainant's side.

Aftermath

The ASA ruling was part of a wider enforcement wave against airline environmental claims. Lufthansa and Etihad were banned in the same action. The cases established that 'sustainable' in aviation advertising requires explicit qualification about the proportion of the business that is actually lower-carbon.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →