Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2019–2020

Ryanair claimed 'lowest emissions of any major airline' — the ASA banned the ads

Ryanair ran ads calling itself the greenest airline. The ASA ruled the claims unsubstantiated: 'major airline' has no agreed definition.

Ryanair · 2020-02

What happened

In September 2019, Ryanair launched a cross-media advertising campaign across press, TV and radio claiming it had the 'lowest carbon emissions of any major airline.' The airline cited a figure of 66 grams of CO2 per passenger-kilometre, which it said was 25% lower than other major European carriers.

The ASA received complaints and investigated. On 5 February 2020, it ruled that Ryanair had broken advertising rules on environmental claims. The ASA found that consumers would understand the ads to mean flying Ryanair meant contributing less CO2 — but Ryanair could not substantiate the claim. There was no common definition of 'major airline,' making the comparison meaningless.

The ASA ordered the ads to stop running in their current forms and required Ryanair to ensure future environmental claims were supported by adequate evidence and that the basis of those claims was made clear. The ruling was one of the first high-profile ASA decisions on airline greenwashing, and it set a precedent for how environmental claims in advertising would be scrutinised.

Why it happened

  • The claim 'lowest emissions of any major airline' sounded precise but rested on an undefined comparator set — 'major airline' has no standard meaning.
  • Ryanair's actual efficiency advantage (high seat density, short routes) was real but was presented as an absolute environmental virtue rather than a relative operational metric.
  • The campaign ran across three media simultaneously, amplifying a claim that could not survive a single regulatory review.
What it costads banned; ASA precedent on greenwashingembarrassing

The lesson

An environmental claim is only as strong as its comparator. If the comparison set is one you invented, the regulator will invent a finding of misleading advertising instead.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →