Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025

Sanex showed dark skin as cracked and itchy, white skin as smooth — the ASA banned the ad

Colgate-Palmolive said it was a 'before and after' scenario. The ASA said it could be read as suggesting white skin was superior to black skin.

Sanex · Colgate-Palmolive · 2025-08-20

What happened

In June 2025, Sanex broadcast a TV ad for its Skin Therapy shower gel range. The ad showed two models with dark skin — one scratching their body, leaving bright orange paint-like stripes, another covered in cracked, clay-like material. It then showed a white woman showering with water and foam, her skin smooth and unmarked. The voiceover addressed 'those who might scratch day and night' and 'those whose skin will feel dried out even by water'.

The ASA upheld two complaints on 20 August 2025, ruling that the ad reinforced a racial stereotype. The ASA said the depiction of white skin as 'smoother and clean after using the product' and 'successfully changed and resolved' could be interpreted as suggesting that white skin was superior to black skin. The ad was banned from being shown again in the same format.

Colgate-Palmolive said it used models with different skin colours as part of its commitment to diversity, and that the ad was intended as a 'before and after' scenario, not a comparison between ethnicities. Clearcast, which had approved the ad for broadcast, said it did not perpetuate negative racial stereotypes. The ASA accepted the message was not intentional but warned Colgate-Palmolive to avoid causing serious offence on the grounds of race.

Why it happened

  • The creative assigned all skin problems to dark-skinned models and all skin health to a white model, creating a visual equation the brand did not intend but the audience could not miss
  • Clearcast approved the ad, meaning the pre-broadcast review process also failed to identify the racial coding
  • The 'before and after' format inherently creates a hierarchy — the brand did not consider that mapping it onto skin colour would produce a racial hierarchy
  • Colgate-Palmolive's defence — commitment to diversity — addressed intent rather than impact, which is not what the ASA evaluates
What it costad banned; ASA ruling for racial stereotypeembarrassing

The lesson

A before-and-after format creates a hierarchy by design — mapping it onto skin colour produces a racial hierarchy regardless of intent, and the regulator judges the reading, not the intention.

Aftermath

Sanex said it took note of the ASA ruling and that its mission was to 'champion skin health for all'. The ASA warned Colgate-Palmolive to ensure future ads avoided causing serious offence on the grounds of race. The ruling was reported by the BBC and cited in broader discussions about racial representation in advertising.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →