The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2019
Zomato's 'food has no religion' tweet turned a customer complaint into a national debate
In 2019, Zomato refused to change a Muslim delivery rider for a Hindu customer and tweeted 'food has no religion,' igniting a polarised backlash.
Zomato · 2019-07
What happened
On July 30, 2019, a customer in Jabalpur, India, cancelled a Zomato order and tweeted that he had done so because the assigned delivery rider was Muslim. Zomato's customer-care team initially offered a refund, but CEO Deepinder Goyal intervened and the company posted a public response: 'Food doesn't have a religion. It is a religion.'
The tweet went viral. Many praised Zomato for standing against discrimination, but a significant segment of social and political opinion attacked the company as 'anti-Hindu' and called for a boycott. The hashtag #BoycottZomato trended. Zomato stood by its position and Goyal said he was 'not sorry to lose any business' over the tweet.
The episode highlighted the risk of national brands being drawn into India's religious polarisation through a single customer interaction. It also showed how a single response, however principled, can become a political flashpoint in a diverse market.
Zomato survived the storm and later grew into one of India's dominant food-delivery platforms. The tweet remains one of its most cited moments of corporate stance-taking.
Why it happened
- A routine customer complaint about rider assignment touched on religious identity in a highly charged political environment.
- Zomato chose a public moral stance rather than a private resolution, which amplified both support and opposition.
- Social media rewarded brevity and symbolism, turning a customer-service decision into a national culture-war story.
- The company's delivery workforce is diverse by necessity, making such conflicts structurally likely in a polarised market.
The lesson
In a polarised market, a principled tweet can cost as much as it gains. Decide in advance which values you will defend publicly, because ad-hoc stance-taking invites attacks from all sides.
Aftermath
Zomato maintained its position and the boycott faded. The case is now used in India to discuss corporate responses to religious discrimination and the risks of viral brand statements.
Sources
- 'Food has no religion': Zomato tweets savage reply — The Economic Times
- Zomato Faces Criticism Over 'Halal' Meat Controversy — News18
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Airth's split-AC filter ad claimed to remove Covid-19 — ASCI upheld it as exaggeration
Raising Superstars sold 'walking at 8 months' — it had zero evidence. India: ₹8 lakh
PhysicsWallah auto-added a ₹10 donation at checkout — CCPA called it basket sneaking
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.