Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026

Airth's split-AC filter ad claimed to remove Covid-19 — ASCI upheld it as exaggeration

Airth told buyers a filter would 'upgrade your AC into a HEPA purifier that removes 99% of PM2.5' and even Covid-19. The tests didn't show it. ASCI upheld.

Airth Research · 2026-07-31

What happened

Airth marketed the AIRTH Filter for Split AC as a way to turn an ordinary split air conditioner into a purifier. The website made two claims: "Removes Harmful Particles – Covid-19, Bacteria, Pollen, PM2.5, PM10" and "AIRTH Filter for Split AC upgrades your AC into a HEPA purifier that removes 99% of PM2.5, allergens, and germs".

ASCI's own monitoring flagged the ad and referred the technical claims to an independent expert. Airth submitted test reports for antiviral efficacy, particulate reduction, filtration efficiency and safety, but the expert found the reports could not back the claims as stated.

The Covid-19 claim rested on a liquid-suspension contact-deactivation test, not air passing through the filter — not representative of how the product is used. Pollen, bacteria and allergens had no supporting test at all, and the reports omitted methodology, equipment, statistical significance, and how performance behaves over time, after cleaning or across replacement cycles. The 99% PM2.5 figure and the 'upgrade into a HEPA purifier' claim were likewise not established.

The Consumer Complaints Council upheld the complaint: both claims were inadequately substantiated and misleading by exaggeration, likely to cause widespread disappointment, breaching Chapter I clauses 1.1, 1.4 and 1.5. The ad had to be modified or withdrawn.

Why it happened

  • Putting 'Covid-19' in an ad invites a test the product was never built to pass: killing the virus in a liquid is not the same as filtering it from passing air
  • The '99%' and 'HEPA purifier' figures were the kind of precise numbers that make a claim sound tested — and the tests, on inspection, did not say what the ad said
  • It was caught by ASCI's own monitoring, not a competitor or a consumer — the complaint did not even need to be filed
What it costBoth claims upheld; ad modified or withdrawnembarrassing

The lesson

A health-linked claim is only as safe as the test that backs it. If the test runs a liquid suspension when the product filters air, the ad is promising something the evidence never showed.

Aftermath

ASCI recommended the misleading representations be modified or withdrawn. The case shows the gap between a lab result and a real-world claim: the antiviral test used conditions a filter never meets in use, and entire categories of the claim — bacteria, pollen, allergens, long-term performance — had no evidence behind them at all.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →