The encyclopedia · Marketing & Brand · Marketing decision · 2018–2025
Zhong Xue Gao sold 66-yuan ice cream to a 3-yuan market — from ¥4B to liquidation
The brand that made 66-yuan ice cream a national argument kept its prices while its freezers emptied. In 2025 a supplier filed it for bankruptcy.
Zhong Xue Gao
What happened
Zhong Xue Gao launched in March 2018 as China's premium ice cream brand: sticks priced at 10 yuan and up — its famous Ecuador Pink Diamond at 66 yuan — sold from the same convenience-store freezers as 3-yuan popsicles. The strategy worked long enough: a 200 million yuan Series A in May 2021 valued the company at 4 billion yuan, and over 85% of its sales stayed above 10 yuan.
The backlash arrived in summer 2022, when consumers named it the leading '雪糕刺客' — the ice cream assassin hidden among cheap sticks that stabs your wallet at the register. Days later, videos showing a stick that did not fully melt at 31°C (and would not burn) turned a pricing argument into a safety one. The brand had form: it had already been fined twice, in 2018 and 2019, for misleading claims, including 'premium Turpan red grapes' that were ordinary raisins.
The pricing broke from the bottom. In March 2023 a 3.5-yuan sub-brand arrived too late; by September, third-party sellers were dumping 10-packs at half the official price, and in 2024 a Weibo trend noted the fall from 60 yuan to 2.5. By March 2024 the company had 24 insured employees left, 35 million yuan of equity frozen and more than 50 lawsuits over unpaid wages and debts. In June 2025 a supplier filed its production subsidiary for bankruptcy review; the 50,000 freezers were gone.
Why it happened
- Premium pricing survived only while the channel hid it — once consumers named the trick, the price itself became the story.
- A quality scare on top of a price backlash is unrecoverable: the 'doesn't melt' videos gave the pricing argument a safety vocabulary.
- The 2023 price cut admitted the positioning was wrong, but cutting prices after the brand is spent only liquidates it faster.
The lesson
A premium price needs a premium reason that survives daylight — if the only moat is that buyers did not notice the price, the first viral receipt ends the business.
Sources
- 新消费(别)被钟薛高吓坏了
- 从66到2.5元贱卖!钟薛高破产清算:被骂“刺客”到全网唾弃
- 雪糕刺客集体退场?钟薛高从66元到2.5元,谁在为高价买单?
- 因资不抵债,钟薛高被申请破产 — 界面新闻
- 初代「雪糕刺客」,破产了 — 36氪
- 「破产」的钟薛高重提「烧不化」 — 21世纪经济报道
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
China's 'first baking stock' ran 1,052 stores, then nine years of losses and a court
Gao Yijiang sold ordinary bottled water as an antioxidant drink and was fined ¥200,000
ChaPanda's miHoYo collab crashed — app down, shelves bare, fans blacklisted brand
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.