Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2009–2010

A 2 a.m. crash emptied Tiger Woods' sponsor list in three weeks

Tiger Woods' 2009 scandal: five sponsors walked within weeks — Accenture, AT&T, Gatorade, Gillette, Tag Heuer — Nike stayed, and endorsements fell $22M a year.

Accenture · AT&T · Gatorade · Tag Heuer · Gillette · 2009-12-13

What happened

In late 2009 Tiger Woods was the most lucrative endorser in sport, earning an estimated $100 million a year from sponsorship. The income rested on a marketed image of perfection, and parts of it on products built around him: Gatorade's Tiger Woods Focus drink, the AT&T logo on his golf bag. On 27 November 2009, days after a tabloid reported extramarital affairs, he crashed his car outside his Florida home in the early hours. On 2 December he admitted his 'transgressions', and on 11 December he announced an indefinite break from golf.

The exits began on 13 December. Accenture ended its six-year relationship with one sentence: 'After careful consideration and analysis the company has determined that he is no longer the right representative for its advertising.' PepsiCo discontinued the Tiger Focus drink. Gillette stopped running his ads and cancelled his appearances. Tag Heuer, which had first said his personal life was 'not our business', pulled his image from its advertising. AT&T ended its sponsorship on 31 December: 'We are ending our sponsorship agreement with Tiger Woods and wish him well in the future.'

Nike did the opposite. The sponsor of thirteen years stood by him — chairman Phil Knight called the episode 'a minor blip' — and EA Sports kept him in its golf games. The divergence showed in the money: by July 2010 Woods' estimated endorsement income was $22 million a year lower than the year before, with total earnings down about 30% from two years earlier. The brands that had built campaigns around one face paid in abandoned advertising; the one that could afford to wait still had him.

Why it happened

  • The asset was an image of perfection, and one person's private conduct could void it overnight — no sponsorship contract can price that risk, however many clauses it carries.
  • The exits were forced to be public and immediate: after Accenture's statement, silence from any other sponsor read as endorsement, so the stampede fed itself within three weeks.
  • Exposure was concentrated: the deals were built around his face and his name, so there was no quiet way to downgrade — the whole campaign was the risk.
  • Nike's stay showed the risk was not symmetric: a diversified roster and a thirteen-year equity view absorbed what single-image campaigns could not.
What it cost5 sponsor deals gone in 3 weeks; endorsements −$22M/yrcostly

The lesson

A campaign built on one face is a single point of failure: no contract prices private conduct, and once one sponsor flees, the rest must follow. Diversify the image, or own the fuse.

Aftermath

Woods returned to competition at the 2010 Masters. Nike kept him — the one sponsor that refused to flee — and the episode became the reference point for endorser risk: an income stream cut by nearly a quarter in a season, with no product failure, no market shift and no injury behind it. For the sponsors that left, the cost was not the fee but the campaign: built around one face, it could not be quietly downgraded, only abandoned.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →