The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Operational decision · 2013–2016
Shanghai Husi fed expired meat to KFC and McDonald's — 10 charged, $3.6M in fines
A TV sting caught the OSI unit using expired meat and faking dates. Its biggest customers cut ties in days; ten people were charged, and the fines held.
Shanghai Husi Food · OSI Group · 2014-07
What happened
Shanghai Husi Food, a Shanghai unit of the US-based OSI Group, supplied processed meat to China's biggest Western fast-food chains — McDonald's, KFC and Pizza Hut among them. In May–June 2013, Yum Brands returned a batch that did not meet its standards and ended some orders. What followed, as the court later established, was not a correction: from March 2013 to July 2014 the company's Shanghai and Hebei plants produced and sold substandard food, passing it off as qualified product.
On 20 July 2014, a Shanghai TV station broadcast secretly filmed footage from inside the plant: workers using expired meat and altering production dates. Within days, McDonald's and Yum cut ties with Husi; other chains followed, and six OSI China employees were held for questioning. For a stretch, McDonald's China ran a reduced menu.
The case ended in two sets of penalties. In February 2016, Shanghai's Jiading district court convicted both Husi companies of producing and selling fake and inferior products — fines of ¥1.2 million each, with ten defendants receiving prison sentences, the ringleader receiving three years. In October 2016, the food regulators' administrative fines were upheld by the court: ¥24.3 million in total, about $3.6 million. OSI called the convictions unjust and appealed.
Why it happened
- The failure was a decision: after Yum returned a batch for failing its standards, managers chose to pass substandard product as qualified. The court dated that conduct from March 2013 to July 2014.
- The customer audits missed it because the supplier was built to pass them: a long-trusted vendor, OSI's Shanghai unit, with production dates and paperwork adjusted to look clean.
- The exposure came from outside the audit system: a reporter with a hidden camera, not a quality inspector. That turned one supplier's failure into a crisis for every brand on the list.
The lesson
The customer's audit had already spoken: the batch that began the case was returned by Yum for failing its standards. The supplier chose to fake production dates instead of fixing the line.
Aftermath
The scandal became a standard case in supply-chain teaching on the limits of scheduled supplier audits — the returned batch was the warning, and the hidden camera was the audit that finally worked.
Sources
- 新华社(英文)— Shanghai food authority fines fast food supplier over meat scandal
- 第一财经 — 上海"福喜案"一审宣判:两公司被罚240万 主犯获刑3年
- AP — China regulators fine OSI Group $3.6M in 2014 meat scandal
- Food Safety News — Supplier to Yum, McDonald's in China calls food safety convictions injustices
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Lactalis recalled 12M baby-milk boxes from 83 countries — charges came five years later
Linyi Ge'erli sold a gel, a pad and gummies as cures in one livestream — ¥100k fine
A standard-setting jelly maker lasted 20 years — then its factory was auctioned on JD.com
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.