Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026

M&M's yellow mascot banned — a shape and a colour turned brand advertising into an HFSS ad

An Instagram ad showed two M&M's characters: the oval yellow one depicted Peanut M&M's and was banned, the round green one 'a range of flavours' and cleared.

Mars Wrigley (M&M's) · 2026-07-08

What happened

On 9 January 2026 a paid-for Instagram ad for M&M's carried the words 'For a truly unique event' and 'Visit mms.com' with a Shop Now link, over two of the brand's cartoon characters: a round green M&M and an oval yellow M&M. The campaign group Bite Back complained that the ad promoted a food high in fat, salt and sugar, breaching the CAP Code's new online placement rules for less healthy food, in force since that month.

Mars Wrigley argued this was brand advertising for the M&M's range rather than for a specific product: the mascots were long-established, anthropomorphised characters with arms, legs and personalities, and neither shape nor colour would let a reasonable consumer identify a specific high-fat, high-salt or high-sugar item. The brand-advertising exemption should therefore apply.

The ASA upheld the complaint on 8 July 2026. Because of its distinct shape and colour, the yellow oval character depicted Peanut M&M's — a specific 'less healthy' product — so the ad was a paid-for ad for an identifiable less healthy product, breaching rule 15.19. It was the first time the online placement ban caught a brand character. The green round character was cleared: it represented a range of flavour variants, not a specific product. The ad must not appear again.

Why it happened

  • A mascot's silhouette is packaging too: the yellow oval was judged to depict Peanut M&M's with no wrapper, name or logo in the frame
  • 'Brand advertising' was the exemption and the character was the brand — until the ASA asked what the character's shape depicted, and the answer was a specific HFSS product
  • The same ad split in two: one mascot was a range of flavours, the other a specific product, so the regulator drew the line and the brand could see exactly where it ran
What it costad banned; mascot use restrictedembarrassing

The lesson

A brand character can be a product claim. When a mascot's shape and colour identify a specific HFSS item, the brand-advertising exemption ends at the character's outline.

Aftermath

The ad must not appear again, and Mars was told not to use brand characters that depict specific less healthy products in future ads. just-food noted the ruling as the first HFSS online placement ban to catch a brand mascot, establishing that shape and colour alone can make a character an identifiable product. Iceland and Lidl had already been banned under the same rules in April 2026; Mars acknowledged the decision and said it welcomed the clarity, committing to use its brand assets responsibly.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →