Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 1935–2001

Mademoiselle published Plath for 66 years — nobody knew what to do with it after

Condé Nast closed the 66-year-old women's magazine on Oct 1, 2001 — ad pages down nearly 18% that year, squeezed by Lucky and the magazines it couldn't outgrow.

Mademoiselle · Condé Nast · 2001-10-01

What happened

Mademoiselle ran for 66 years — founded in 1935, bought by Sam Newhouse from Street & Smith in 1959 — and in its prime printed Sylvia Plath, Joyce Carol Oates, David Sedaris and Maureen Dowd. By the late 1990s it was a magazine without a lane: too big to be edgy, too established to be new. A 'Sassy-fication' push borrowed a younger magazine's voice; a mass-market swing put supermodels on the cover; neither stuck.

Former editor Elizabeth Crow, who had steered a brief return to profit before leaving, said it plainly: 'The secret is that nobody really knew what to do with Mademoiselle. I really ran out of concepts, and I don't think James Truman had one either. And I think they're really excited about Lucky.' Lucky — Condé Nast's own shopping-magazine start-up — was the company's stated future, and Mademoiselle's young-women readers were its target too; Marie Claire and Jane squeezed the same space from outside.

On October 1, 2001, Condé Nast announced the magazine would cease publication. Spokeswoman Maurie Perl cited the weak advertising climate, worsened by the September 11 attacks; industry observers noted the title had not been profitable for years, and ad pages had already fallen nearly 18% in the first eight months of 2001. Circulation was still 1.1 million — an audience the company chose to hand to Lucky rather than keep.

Why it happened

  • The magazine lost its definition: squeezed between glossier rivals (Marie Claire, Cosmopolitan) and voice-driven newcomers (Sassy's heirs, Jane), it imitated each in turn and owned none of them.
  • Condé Nast's own portfolio made the decision — Lucky was the growth bet for exactly Mademoiselle's audience, and the parent company stopped conceiving futures for the old title.
  • The September 2001 advertising collapse was the trigger, not the cause; the title had been unprofitable for years and ad pages were down nearly 18% before the attack.
What it cost66-year title dead at 1.1M circulationcostly

The lesson

A magazine can survive losing readers but not losing its definition — once the owner's new title targets your audience, your circulation is just the handover list.

Aftermath

Condé Nast insisted the closure had nothing to do with Lucky, which Truman attended a charity event for just three weeks earlier; Elizabeth Crow said the owner should have shelved the title and revived it later with a strong editor instead of letting it die. Editor Mandi Norwood received the news in tears; the fiction pages, which had once run Plath, had already quietly gone.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →