Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2013–2021

Hyflux funded a flagship plant with retail debt repayable only if power prices held

Singapore's water champion bet its flagship plant on power prices it didn't control, borrowing S$900M from 34,000 retail investors never told that was the bet.

Hyflux · Olivia Lum

What happened

Hyflux was Singapore's home-grown water-treatment champion. Founded by former journalist Olivia Lum in 1989 with S$20,000 of saved salary, it built the desalination and membrane technology that helped a water-scarce city-state become self-sufficient, and was listed on the SGX-ST in 2003 as one of its most-watched success stories.

Tuaspring, its second seawater desalination plant, was pitched as the company's flagship: an integrated water-and-power facility whose profitability depended on selling electricity from its co-located power plant into Singapore's merchant market. Construction finished in 2013, but electricity sales did not begin until February 2016 — and by then a glut of generation capacity had pushed pool prices to levels Hyflux's own 2016 annual report warned would 'continue impacting' the plant.

To finance this and other expansion, Hyflux sold perpetual preference shares and perpetual securities — instruments with no fixed redemption date — directly to the public. In May 2016, the very month the plant began losing money, it upsized a perpetual securities issue from S$300M to S$500M on 'red-hot' retail demand. About 34,000 retail investors were owed S$900M when the company fell.

In February 2018 Hyflux posted its first full-year loss since listing, with Tuaspring alone S$81.9M in the red. In May 2018 it halted trading and applied to the Singapore High Court for court-supervised debt restructuring. The state water agency PUB took Tuaspring back at no cost in 2019. After three years of failed rescues, the High Court placed Hyflux under judicial management in November 2020 and ordered it wound up in July 2021 — the end of a company once held up as a national model.

Why it happened

  • The plant's economics were an electricity bet dressed as a water asset: desalination alone could not pay, so survival depended on merchant power prices Hyflux did not control and could not forecast.
  • Hyflux funded a long-duration, price-exposed project with perpetual securities sold to retail investors who had no way to value the embedded power-market risk.
  • The 2016 perpetual securities offering did not adequately disclose that Tuaspring relied on electricity sales — the omission that later became the criminal case against Lum and six others.
  • Management doubled down at the worst moment: the May 2016 issue was upsized exactly when the plant's power-revenue model was already failing.
What it costS$2.8B liabilities; S$900M owed to 34,000 retail investorscatastrophic

The lesson

If a project's cashflow depends on a market price you cannot control, the debt behind it must be priced for that risk — not sold at par to retail investors who were never told it existed.

Aftermath

Tuaspring was taken over by Singapore's PUB at no cost in 2019. Olivia Lum and six former executives and directors were charged over Hyflux's failure to disclose Tuaspring's reliance on electricity sales; former independent director Rajsekar Kuppuswami Mitta pleaded guilty and was fined S$90,000. The winding-up was finalised in 2021, and the criminal trial of Lum and the remaining defendants continued into 2025. The case reshaped Singapore's framework for perpetual securities sold to retail investors.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →