Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Sales & Retail · Strategic decision · 2017–2026

HARMAY sold luxury samples at pocket-money prices — the traffic came, the profits didn't

A $200M war chest, warehouse stores teenagers photographed for fun, and big brands sold at zero margin. Closures began within two years of the raise.

HARMAY

What happened

HARMAY (话梅) opened its first stores around 2017 and became China's most photographed beauty retailer: warehouse-style spaces, one-store-one-design interiors, and a draw that made it famous — the 小样, luxury-brand samples sold cheap, letting young shoppers buy a piece of a counter brand for pocket money. In early 2022 it raised nearly $200 million across its C and D rounds, at a valuation later reported near ¥6.9 billion.

The model's contradictions showed within two years of the raise. The samples brought crowds but not always purchases — reviews of closed stores concentrated on 'expensive' and 'only browse, don't buy'; the big international brands were traffic sold at zero margin or a loss, while the small brands that carried the profit sat in the corners. In early 2022, Shanghai regulators fined and confiscated more than ¥887,000 over sample products with incomplete Chinese labelling — the gray area of reselling items marked 'not for sale'.

The closures began: HARMAY's only Hangzhou store shut in July 2023, its Xi'an store in October, each about two years old. The company talked of strategic adjustment; the heavy one-store-one-design build-out could not be standardised or scaled, and the full-size prices sat awkwardly between e-commerce and brand counters. A store that was a destination people visited once could not carry a unit economy that needed them to buy.

Why it happened

  • Samples are a loss leader by nature — when the loss leader is what customers come for and the full-price product is what they compare online, the traffic monetises for someone else.
  • Selling items marked 'not for sale' borrows the brand owners' marketing budget without their permission — the compliance risk and the brand-relationship risk are the same risk.
  • A one-store-one-design flagship is a marketing asset with a retailer's cost base; it photographs well, and it does not replicate.
What it costa $200M raise, stores closing at two yearscostly

The lesson

A destination store wins the visit and loses the repeat — if the draw is an experience and the margin is somewhere else in the store, measure what the visit converts, not how many people came.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →