The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2022
CNKI was fined ¥87.6M for monopoly — China's academic paywall finally broke
The SAMR fined the academic database 5% of its 2021 revenue for exclusive dealing and unfair pricing against universities
CNKI · 知网 · 2022-12-26
What happened
China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the country's dominant academic database, was fined ¥87.6 million by the State Administration for Market Regulation in December 2022 for abusing its market dominance. The penalty was 5% of CNKI's 2021 domestic revenue of ¥1.752 billion. The SAMR found that CNKI had locked academic journals and universities into exclusive agreements and charged unfairly high prices for access to its database.
CNKI's monopoly had been a long-standing grievance in Chinese academia. Universities paid millions each year for access to the same papers their own faculty had written, and CNKI's exclusive deals prevented journals from listing with competitors. The case was opened in May 2022 after public outcry, notably when a graduate student sued CNKI for charging ¥15 for a paper download while paying the author virtually nothing. CNKI responded to the fine by pledging to end exclusive agreements, lower prices, and improve author compensation.
Why it happened
- CNKI used its dominance to lock journals into exclusivity and charge universities monopoly prices, profiting at the expense of the institutions it served
- The company ignored years of criticism from the academic community, forcing a regulatory intervention that it could have avoided by voluntary reform
The lesson
A platform that controls access to essential infrastructure — academic papers, search results, payment rails — is a public utility, and monopoly pricing will eventually invite a regulator
Sources
- Tencent News — 解读知网反垄断案:8760万罚款背后还有什么?
- The Paper — 知网被罚8760万元!责令全面整改!
- SAMR — 市场监管总局依法对知网作出行政处罚
- CCTV — 知网被罚8760万
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
China fined Ctrip ¥5.2 billion for forcing hotels to choose — the first OTA antitrust case
NetEase built its own livestreaming platform for 17 years — then shut it down for good
Kuaishou's 'sales only go up' feature got it fined ¥26.7M for faking data
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.