Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2018–2021

HomePod priced a weak Siri at $349 — Apple killed the first generation in 2021

Apple priced its smart speaker at $349, three times the Echo, with no voice-assistant edge; it never took off and Apple discontinued it.

Apple · 2021-03-12

What happened

In February 2018 Apple launched the HomePod as a premium smart speaker, priced at $349 — roughly three times the Amazon Echo or Google Home it was meant to compete with.

The price was supposed to be justified by sound quality, but the product was also a voice assistant, and its Siri was the weakest of the three. Buyers who wanted a voice assistant chose the cheaper Echo; buyers who wanted sound chose a real speaker.

Sales told the story: about 600,000 units and a 6% share in Q1 2018, putting it fourth behind Amazon, Google and Alibaba. Apple cut the price to $299 in April 2019, but the product stayed a niche.

On 12 March 2021 Apple discontinued the original HomePod, keeping only the smaller, cheaper HomePod Mini. The flagship speaker was quietly retired as a premium bet that never earned its price.

Why it happened

  • At $349, three times the rivals, the HomePod needed an edge to justify itself, but its Siri assistant was the weakest of the options
  • The product was caught between two jobs — a smart assistant and an audiophile speaker — and lost to the Echo on value and to proper speakers on sound
  • A 6% share and a fourth-place finish showed the premium pitch never moved the market, and the price cut came too late to change the story
What it cost600k units / 6% share in Q1 2018; discontinued Mar 2021costly

The lesson

A premium price needs a reason a buyer can feel. Charging $349 for a speaker whose main rival did the assistant job at a third of the price left the HomePod a niche, and Apple retired it.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →