Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · People & Management · Operational decision · 2021

Amazon's warehouse productivity targets were so aggressive that workers peed in bottles

Amazon's 'time off task' tracking and 300-item-per-hour targets created conditions where workers reported urinating in bottles. Unionization efforts followed.

Amazon · 2021

What happened

Amazon's fulfillment centers use a productivity tracking system that monitors workers' 'time off task' (TOT) — every second not spent scanning, packing or stowing items is logged. Workers are expected to handle approximately 300 items per hour, and those who fall below the threshold receive automated warnings that can lead to termination.

In 2021, reports emerged that Amazon warehouse workers were urinating in bottles and bags because bathroom breaks would trigger TOT warnings and jeopardize their jobs. Amazon initially denied the claims, then acknowledged the problem after internal investigations confirmed it. The revelations sparked public outrage and intensified unionization efforts.

The case illustrated how a productivity metric, optimized without regard for human biology, creates inhumane working conditions. Amazon's system treated workers as components in a machine, measuring output to the second. The metric was not wrong — it was the only thing the system measured, and what gets measured gets optimized, even when the optimization dehumanizes.

Why it happened

  • Amazon's TOT tracking system logged every second of non-productive time, creating pressure to skip breaks.
  • Workers reported urinating in bottles to avoid TOT warnings and termination.
  • The 300-item-per-hour target was optimized for throughput without regard for human needs.
  • Amazon initially denied the reports, then acknowledged the problem after internal investigation.
What it costpublic outrage; unionization drive; brand damagecostly

The lesson

What gets measured gets optimized. Amazon's TOT system measured productivity to the second but not whether workers could use the bathroom. An optimization that ignores biology is cruelty.

Aftermath

Amazon adjusted its TOT policies and invested in workplace improvements. The Bessemer, Alabama warehouse held a union vote (which Amazon won, but the effort continued). The case became a focal point in the debate about warehouse working conditions and algorithmic management.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →