mistake.club2nd Opinion
Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2019

Amazon's Dash Button was a $5 button for detergent — obsolete in 3 years

Amazon sold $5 physical buttons you pressed to reorder Tide or paper towels. Smartphones made them pointless. Amazon killed the Dash Button in 2019.

Amazon · 2019-02

What happened

Amazon launched the Dash Button in 2015: a small, $5 WiFi-connected button branded with a specific product (Tide, Bounty, Duracell) that you stuck on your washing machine or pantry wall. Press it, and Amazon orders more. The concept was 'frictionless reordering' — remove the app, the search, the cart.

But the Dash Button was a hardware solution to a software problem. Amazon's own app, Alexa voice ordering, and Subscribe & Save all did the same thing without a physical button on your wall. The Dash Button added a step (walk to the button, press it) that the smartphone had already eliminated.

Amazon stopped selling physical Dash Buttons in February 2019, replacing them with 'virtual' Dash Buttons in the app. The case illustrated how a single-purpose hardware device is vulnerable to obsolescence when the general-purpose device in your pocket already does the job. The best button is the one you don't need.

Why it happened

  • The Dash Button was a hardware solution to a problem the smartphone had already solved.
  • Amazon's own app, Alexa and Subscribe & Save offered the same reordering without a physical button.
  • The $5 button added a step (walk to it, press it) that the phone had eliminated.
  • Amazon replaced physical buttons with virtual ones in the app in 2019.
What it costproduct line discontinued after 4 yearsembarrassing

The lesson

A single-purpose hardware device is vulnerable to the general-purpose device in your pocket. When the phone already does it, the dedicated button is a novelty.

Aftermath

Amazon replaced physical Dash Buttons with virtual ones and 'Dash Replenishment' integrated into smart appliances. The concept of frictionless reordering survived; the button did not. The case is cited as an example of how platform owners can obsolete their own hardware.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    1999–2001 · Finance & Accounting

    eToys was worth $8B on paper — and bankrupt 20 months later

    $8B peak to $10M sale
    1998–2001 · Finance & Accounting

    Kozmo delivered DVDs and snacks in one hour — and burned $280M doing it

    $280M raised and lost
    2019–2025 · Product & Design

    Nike's SNKRS app blocked 12B bot requests a month — and still lost its core customers

    70% stock drop; 90% of SNKRS team cut

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →