The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025
Yume Group's mask ads hid the fees behind a '5 days only' price
30 masks for ¥3,600, 'valid 5 days', no extra costs implied — but fees were added and the deal never ended. CAA surcharge: ¥65.89M on ¥2.2B of sales.
Yume Group · 2025-03-21
What happened
Yume Group, a Japanese mail-order company, ran newspaper ads as the pandemic began: a '3D Mask 30-Piece Set' for 3,600 yen (tax excluded), with 'today's ad validity period: 5 days'. Regional editions ran between 13 March and 26 April 2020 — from Hokkaido to Kyushu and Okinawa — offering, in the middle of the mask shortage, a set at the advertised price with no extra costs implied.
Neither claim held up. Buyers paid the 3,600 yen plus shipping and handling fees the ads never mentioned, and the same sets stayed available on identical terms after the five-day window had passed. The Consumer Affairs Agency treated the ads as misleading representations of advantageous terms; Saitama Prefecture had already issued a measure order against the same displays on 11 June 2020.
On 21 March 2025 the CAA ordered Yume Group to pay a surcharge of 65,890,000 yen — 3% of the 2,196,628,642 yen in mask-set sales recorded during the violation periods, payable by 22 October 2025. The number reflected the moment: the spring-2020 mask shortage turned a newspaper ad into a ¥2.2 billion run, and the surcharge regime turned the ads' framing into a bill.
Why it happened
- The advertised price was not the price: shipping and handling fees were added on top of the 3,600 yen, and the ads said nothing about them.
- The five-day limit meant nothing: the same sets remained available on identical terms after every 'validity period' expired.
- Saitama had already ordered the displays stopped in June 2020; the surcharge, five years on, converted the same violation into money.
The lesson
The advertised price must be the price: Yume Group's pandemic mask ads hid fees behind a '5 days only' framing — the CAA charged 3% of ¥2.2 billion in sales.
Aftermath
The CAA's surcharge order of 21 March 2025 followed Saitama Prefecture's measure order of 11 June 2020. Yume Group had to pay 65,890,000 yen by 22 October 2025, calculated on 2,196,628,642 yen of mask sales from spring 2020.
Sources
- 消費者庁: 株式会社夢グループに対する景品表示法に基づく課徴金納付命令について (21 March 2025)
- 読売新聞: 夢グループに課徴金6589万円…コロナ禍でのマスク販売で広告と異なる価格 (21 March 2025)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Geo's 'limited-time' buyback deals never ended — the CAA's first buyback order
Hasegawa Sangyo's furniture 'regular price' never existed — the discount was built on air
Tsuruha's online shop showed 'regular prices' that nobody had paid
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.