The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Strategic decision · 2015–2026
Yanghe peaked at ¥33B as China's baijiu No.3 — then the winter came
Yanghe, China's No.3 premium baijiu maker, peaked at ¥33.1B of revenue in 2023. FY2025: revenue down 33.5%, profit down 67%, a ¥1.77B loss in Q4 alone.
Yanghe Distillery (洋河股份, 002304.SZ) · 2026-04-28
What happened
Yanghe rose from a Jiangsu distillery to the third name in China's premium baijiu on two inventions: the Blue Classic brand line launched in 2003, and a deep-distribution model that pushed product into thousands of distributor warehouses. National expansion began in 2015; by 2022 the company had entered the ¥30 billion club, and 2023 was the peak — revenue ¥33.126 billion, attributable profit ¥10.016 billion, both records. For 14 years Yanghe held the title of China's No.3 baijiu maker.
FY2025 was the second year of the decline, and the brutal one: revenue ¥19.211 billion, down 33.47%; attributable profit ¥2.206 billion, down 66.94%; Q4 alone lost ¥1.769 billion on ¥1.121 billion of revenue. Operating cash flow flipped from +¥4.63 billion to -¥763 million. Mid-to-high-end liquor fell 32%, ordinary liquor 43%, in-province and out-of-province alike; ¥125 million of goodwill on the Shuanggou unit was written off. Selling expenses of ¥5.21 billion came down barely 6% against a third of the revenue gone.
The distributor network broke first. 495 accounts left during the year, and the exodus became visible in H1, when 268 out-of-province distributors quit — the first net reduction since the 2015 expansion began — as support was pulled toward a new 'regional focus' on Jiangsu and the Yangtze delta. On July 1, 2025, chairman Zhang Liandong resigned mid-term, apologising to investors for being 'relatively lagging in this round of development'; Gu Yu, the district head of Sucheng, took over. The dividend held at ¥2.214 billion — more than the full-year profit.
Why it happened
- Growth was pushed into distributor warehouses rather than sold through. When banquet demand shrank, channel inventory drove Blue Dream (梦之蓝) prices below the levels the model needed.
- The retreat cut the growth engine: the 2025 pivot to 'regional focus' pulled support from out-of-province distributors, and 268 of them left in six months — the first net decline since 2015.
- Premiumization arrived late and crowded: Yanghe chased the high end just as the industry turned, lost the No.3 seat it had held 14 years, and saw national baijiu output fall 12.1% in 2025.
The lesson
Yanghe spent a decade pushing baijiu into distributor warehouses and calling it growth. When demand turned, the model ran in reverse: revenue -33%, profit -67%, 495 distributors gone in a year.
Aftermath
Gu Yu inherits a company in its second year of decline: Q1 2026 revenue and profit still under pressure, channel inventory not yet cleared, and the home market under attack from Gujing Gongjiu and Jinshiyuan. The stated plan is to stop the bleeding first — a 'quality revolution', brand rebuilding, R&D spend up 41% — while the dividend is maintained at ¥2.214 billion, more than FY2025's profit. The share that stood at ¥179.45 in February 2021 traded at ¥64.64 when the chairman left. Whether deep distribution can be unwound without losing what remains of the network is the open question.
Sources
- Sohu — Yanghe FY2025 results explained: revenue ¥19.211B -33.47%, attributable profit ¥2.206B -66.94%, Q4 loss ¥1.77B, operating cash flow turns negative, 495 distributors gone, 2026-04-28
- Sohu — Yanghe H1 2025: revenue and profit both fall, out-of-province distributors down 268 as the nationalization strategy stalls, 2025-09-12
- 36Kr — Why Yanghe suddenly changed its leader: Zhang Liandong resigns, share price down over 60% in his tenure, the No.3 baijiu seat lost, 2025-07-09
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
From ¥10B to its first loss: VATS met the baijiu winter
China's fruit king went from HK$67B to forced delisting in 40 months
Moutai's wholesale price fell below its own list price — the 'liquid gold' myth broke
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.