On January 11, 2022, Watsons China ran a flash promotion on Meituan: two face-mask products normally priced at ¥49 and ¥59 were offered for 1 cent each, capped at five boxes per person. Stores had never carried enough stock for a giveaway at that scale — one outlet had barely a dozen boxes of the product before the sale, sold out by mid-morning — but the order system kept confirming purchases well past that limit. One store manager described opening up to find over 200 orders waiting.

Watsons later said the flood of 'anomalous' orders was a system failure: a backend request queue built up faster than the database could check remaining stock, so it kept returning 'order confirmed' regardless. Buyers who had a confirmation message and an empty shelf in front of them went to Watsons' own livestream to ask what had happened.

The stream's host, a third-party contractor, answered by insulting them on camera: complaining that customers chasing '1 cent worth of goods' were 'biting like mad dogs,' and boasting 'I'm happy to kick you out' as viewers were blocked and removed. Internal guidance leaked afterward showed staff had been told, when asked how the mask issue would be resolved, simply not to answer.

By January 15, complaints on the Black Cat platform topped 1,500. Watsons apologized before dawn that day, promised to restock and eventually fulfil every order, and said the host's words did not reflect the company's attitude toward customers — a distinction that did nothing to explain why its own livestream had been running unsupervised in the first place.

Watsons apologized and promised to fulfill every order after 1,500+ complaints, but the host's insults had already turned a stock bug into a PR crisis.

The order system confirmed purchases without checking real-time stock, so a promotion capped at five boxes per buyer oversold by hundreds of orders per store within hours

Watsons put a third-party contractor in charge of its livestream with no apparent oversight, and that host insulted paying customers on camera when they asked why their orders weren't honored

Internal guidance told frontline staff to give no answer at all when asked how the shortfall would be resolved, turning a stock problem into a stonewalling one

The apology came four days after the promotion and only after 1,500+ complaints had accumulated publicly, rather than once the oversell was first discovered in stores

A promotion's failure mode is rarely the discount — it's what the system does when it can't back it up. An inventory bug became a crisis once an unsupervised host met the customers it had failed.

Watsons committed to restocking and fulfilling outstanding orders and distanced itself from the contracted host's comments. The episode became a widely cited case study in Chinese retail media about livestream commerce risk, cited years later alongside Watsons' broader struggles with discount promotions and declining store traffic in China.

FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

The sources

  1. 屈臣氏'1分钱抢面膜'翻车后续:有线下门店称事先不知情 — 每经网 nbd.com.cn
  2. 主播嘲讽消费者像疯狗,屈臣氏深夜致歉 — 新浪财经 cj.sina.com.cn
  3. '一分钱面膜'活动主播惹祸,一场促销毁掉多年累积的好印象 — 澎湃新闻 m.thepaper.cn