The encyclopedia · People & Management · People decision · 2023–2025
Vestis's CEO talked up 'service excellence' while service gaps bled customers
Kimberly Scott promised service excellence at the Aramark spin-off; when service gaps were disclosed, the stock fell 45% and she was gone.
Vestis · 2025-03
What happened
Vestis, the North American uniform and workplace-supplies business, spun off from Aramark on 30 September 2023. Executives promised 5% to 7% annual revenue growth, a sales force that had 'reached their stride,' and 'service excellence.' CEO Kimberly Scott repeated the story after the company began trading as NYSE: VSTS.
The story collapsed on 2 May 2024. Vestis cut its full-year revenue outlook to negative 1% to 0%, and Scott admitted on the earnings call that 'service gaps' had made customers price-sensitive. The company reversed a recent price increase into a decrease to keep customers. The stock fell 45% that day, from $18.47 to $10.16.
A securities class action later alleged that Scott and CFO Rick Dillon knew Aramark had underinvested in the business, that facilities were outdated, the sales force was underperforming, and service gaps were causing customer attrition before the May disclosure. By fiscal Q2 2025 Vestis reported an operating loss, a $15 million bad-debt reserve, $10 million of executive-exit costs, and the loss of a national account.
On 18 March 2025 the Board removed Scott as President, CEO and director. The 8-K cited no disagreement, but the prior year had shown the opposite. Phillip Holloman, a retired Cintas president, became interim CEO, and Vestis later launched a multi-year transformation plan. The court allowed the class action to proceed, finding Scott and Dillon knew service failures were costing millions in recurring revenue weekly.
Why it happened
- Leadership repeated optimistic growth and service claims while knowing that underinvestment, outdated facilities and service gaps were causing customer attrition.
- The pricing strategy was reversed in public — from price increase to price decrease — confirming the company had lost pricing power and credibility.
- Operational gaps were not fixed before the spin-off. Aramark had underinvested, leaving Vestis with an underperforming sales force and service problems from day one.
- Disclosure came only when results forced it. The May 2024 guidance cut came after months of assurances, exposing the gap between internal knowledge and public statements.
- Customer retention collapsed. By fiscal Q2 2025, lost business and existing-customer declines were large enough to drive an operating loss and a bad-debt reserve.
The lesson
You cannot price your way past operational gaps. Promising service excellence while failures drain revenue eventually forces a CEO change.
Aftermath
Kimberly Scott left Vestis on 18 March 2025. Phillip Holloman served as interim CEO until Jim Barber took over in June 2025. In December 2025 Vestis announced a multi-year transformation plan targeting at least $75 million in annual cost savings by the end of fiscal 2026, alongside commercial and operational fixes. The securities class action was allowed to proceed, with the court finding that Scott and Dillon knew service failures were costing the company millions in recurring revenue each week.
Sources
- Vestis SEC Form 8-K: Kim Scott departure and Phillip Holloman appointment as interim CEO (Item 5.02, 18 March 2025)
- Vestis press release: Q2 FY2025 results, operating loss, $15M bad-debt expense, credit-agreement amendment (6 May 2025)
- Vestis press release: Q1 FY2025 results, 93% net-income decline, CFO transition (31 January 2025)
- Saxena White: Vestis securities class action summary, including 45% stock drop, service-gap admissions, and court findings
- Vestis press release: completion of spin-off from Aramark (2 October 2023)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Rite Aid 'restructured' once, kept the stores, and was liquidated eight months later
Stellantis cut 47,500 jobs for €8.4B savings — then fired its CEO as profit fell 70%
Stitch Fix's CEO lasted 17 months — her Freestyle strategy cost the company its growth
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.