Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025

Tsuruha's online shop showed 'regular prices' that nobody had paid

79 products on the drugstore group's e-shop carried 'Regular Price' tags with no sales record behind them. CAA measure order, November 2025.

Tsuruha Group Merchandising · 2025-11-28

What happened

Tsuruha Group Merchandising, the merchandising arm of Japan's biggest drugstore group, runs the group's online store, 'Tsuruha Group e-shop Honten'. From 26 February to 7 June 2025, 79 products there — hand soaps, masks, baby food, pet food, household cleaners — were listed with a 'special price' next to a 'regular price': Kao Biore u foaming hand soap refill at 'Special Price ¥498' against 'Regular Price ¥612', a Lion KireiKirei dispenser set at ¥1,955 against ¥2,418.

The regular prices had no reality behind them: the CAA found no sales record for any of the 79 products at those amounts over a considerable recent period. Nobody had been paying the anchor price, so the displayed saving was invented. The agency ruled the displays misleading about advantageous terms — shoppers were made to believe they were getting a genuine discount against a real standard price.

On 28 November 2025 the CAA issued a measure order: publicly notify consumers that the displays were misleading, prevent recurrence, and stop similar representations. The company said it accepted the matter sincerely, had not realised the displays violated the law, and would prevent recurrence through internal training.

Why it happened

  • 79 products displayed 'regular prices' with no sales record over a considerable recent period — anchor prices nobody had paid.
  • Dual pricing ('Special Price ¥498 / Regular Price ¥612') made everyday essentials look like deeper bargains than they were.
  • Advantageous-terms misrepresentation: the invented anchor inflated the perceived discount.
What it costmeasure order, public noticeembarrassing

The lesson

An anchor price must be a real price: Tsuruha's e-shop listed 'regular prices' with no sales record behind 79 products, and Japan's CAA ruled the bargain display misleading.

Aftermath

The measure order of 28 November 2025 required Tsuruha Group Merchandising to publicly notify consumers that the dual-price displays were misleading, prevent recurrence and report to the CAA. The company said it had not realised the displays violated the law and would retrain staff.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →