The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025
Tsuruha's online shop showed 'regular prices' that nobody had paid
79 products on the drugstore group's e-shop carried 'Regular Price' tags with no sales record behind them. CAA measure order, November 2025.
Tsuruha Group Merchandising · 2025-11-28
What happened
Tsuruha Group Merchandising, the merchandising arm of Japan's biggest drugstore group, runs the group's online store, 'Tsuruha Group e-shop Honten'. From 26 February to 7 June 2025, 79 products there — hand soaps, masks, baby food, pet food, household cleaners — were listed with a 'special price' next to a 'regular price': Kao Biore u foaming hand soap refill at 'Special Price ¥498' against 'Regular Price ¥612', a Lion KireiKirei dispenser set at ¥1,955 against ¥2,418.
The regular prices had no reality behind them: the CAA found no sales record for any of the 79 products at those amounts over a considerable recent period. Nobody had been paying the anchor price, so the displayed saving was invented. The agency ruled the displays misleading about advantageous terms — shoppers were made to believe they were getting a genuine discount against a real standard price.
On 28 November 2025 the CAA issued a measure order: publicly notify consumers that the displays were misleading, prevent recurrence, and stop similar representations. The company said it accepted the matter sincerely, had not realised the displays violated the law, and would prevent recurrence through internal training.
Why it happened
- 79 products displayed 'regular prices' with no sales record over a considerable recent period — anchor prices nobody had paid.
- Dual pricing ('Special Price ¥498 / Regular Price ¥612') made everyday essentials look like deeper bargains than they were.
- Advantageous-terms misrepresentation: the invented anchor inflated the perceived discount.
The lesson
An anchor price must be a real price: Tsuruha's e-shop listed 'regular prices' with no sales record behind 79 products, and Japan's CAA ruled the bargain display misleading.
Aftermath
The measure order of 28 November 2025 required Tsuruha Group Merchandising to publicly notify consumers that the dual-price displays were misleading, prevent recurrence and report to the CAA. The company said it had not realised the displays violated the law and would retrain staff.
Sources
- 消費者庁: 株式会社ツルハグループマーチャンダイジングに対する景品表示法に基づく措置命令について (28 November 2025)
- Wellness News: 消費者庁、ツルハ子会社に措置命令 通販サイトで二重価格表示 (1 December 2025)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Geo's 'limited-time' buyback deals never ended — the CAA's first buyback order
Hasegawa Sangyo's furniture 'regular price' never existed — the discount was built on air
Iris Plaza's Qoo10 store called 101 foreign-made goods 'domestic'
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.