Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2024

A top Chinese livestreamer sold a 'Hong Kong' mooncake that Hong Kong couldn't buy

小杨哥's firm Three Sheep sold a mooncake as a Hong Kong brand with no Hong Kong stores. Regulators called it misleading, fined it ¥68.9M and suspended it.

Three Sheep · 2024-09

What happened

疯狂小杨哥 (Crazy Little Brother Yang, known as 小杨哥) is one of China's biggest livestreamers, with tens of millions of followers on Douyin. His company, Hefei Three Sheep Network Technology (合肥三只羊网络科技有限公司), sells products through his livestreams. In September 2024, ahead of the Mid-Autumn Festival, it promoted a mooncake brand called '香港美诚' (Hong Kong Meicheng), marketing it as a Hong Kong product.

Consumers and reporters noticed that the 'Hong Kong' mooncake could not be bought in Hong Kong. The brand's own customer service said it had marketing and production bases in Guangzhou and Foshan and no offline stores in Hong Kong at all. The 'Hong Kong' branding was a marketing story, not a fact — 'the Hong Kong mooncake you cannot buy in Hong Kong' became a national joke, and then a regulatory case.

On 26 September 2024 the Hefei Market Supervision Administration ruled that Three Sheep's livestream promotion of the mooncake was false and misleading commercial promotion. It confiscated the company's illegal gains and imposed a fine totalling ¥68.95 million (6,894.91万元), and ordered Three Sheep to suspend operations and rectify. The company paid in full and, under the consumer-law 'refund one, compensate three' standard, paid about ¥27.78 million in compensation — roughly ¥96.73 million in all.

Why it happened

  • The 'Hong Kong' label was the selling point — it let a mainland mooncake borrow the prestige and price premium of a Hong Kong brand without being one.
  • Livestream commerce sells on trust and speed: a host's claim becomes a purchase in seconds, before any viewer can check whether the story is true.
  • Three Sheep had built its business on 小杨哥's personal credibility, so a misleading claim was not a small vendor's slip but a bet of the whole platform's reputation.
  • Regulators were already tightening livestream-commerce rules, so the case became an example — the penalty was large because the channel was large.
What it costfined ¥68.9M; suspended; ¥96.7M with refundscostly

The lesson

Reach turns a claim into a sale before anyone can check it. 'Hong Kong brand' sold the mooncake; that Hong Kong had never heard of it was the one thing viewers could not verify in time.

Aftermath

Three Sheep paid the penalty in full by October 2024 and went quiet. 小杨哥's accounts stopped broadcasting for about 198 days, and he lost more than 10 million followers. On 23 March 2025 a Hefei joint investigation group said the company had paid fines and compensation totalling ¥96.73 million and met the conditions to resume operations. The case became a reference point in China's crackdown on misleading livestream promotion: the bigger the audience a host commands, the larger the bill when the story they sell turns out to be false.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →