Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 1994–2011

Sugar redesigned itself in December — Hachette closed the print edition in March

Hachette's 1994 teen title fell from 250,099 to 113,320 copies; the March 2011 issue was the last, and the brand moved to Sugarscape.com.

Sugar · Hachette Filipacchi UK · Sugarscape · 2011-02

What happened

Hachette Filipacchi UK launched Sugar in October 1994, and for a decade it was a fixture of the British teen magazine shelf. Then the paying readers drained away: circulation fell from 250,099 to 113,320 over five years, and across the decade the drop was 75 per cent, according to ABC figures.

In December 2010 Sugar relaunched with a larger format and better paper stock — a magazine spending its way out of trouble. Two months later the print edition was dead: the March issue, on sale February 23, was the last monthly, with one final Sugar Beauty Special to follow in April. A spokeswoman put the blame on the readers' new habits: 'Over the past decade the teen magazine market has declined by 75% as teens spend their media time on mobile and web platforms and increasingly expect to receive content for free.'

The publisher's arithmetic was blunter still. Rita Lewis, publisher of Sugar, Elle and Elle Decoration, called print 'no longer a viable business' and pointed to Sugarscape.com — the site launched in 2007 — which 'delivers a healthy return'. The print editorial and advertising teams went into consultation, with the company promising to do its utmost to redeploy staff; editor Annabel Brog's future inside the house was unknown. Above it all, parent Lagardère was negotiating the sale of its international magazine portfolio to Hearst — Sugar's print edition did not survive the transition.

Why it happened

  • Circulation fell more than half in five years to 113,320 — and the December redesign with better paper stock only proved a fresh coat couldn't change the trajectory.
  • The whole UK teen market shrank three-quarters in a decade as readers moved to free mobile and web content; no single title could outlast its own category.
  • Ownership was mid-sale — Lagardère was handing its international portfolio to Hearst — and a loss-making print edition was a line to cut before the deal, not an asset to inherit.
What it cost16-year print run ended at 113,320 copiescostly

The lesson

A redesign buys a magazine one more season, not a future — when the whole category shrinks by three quarters, the owner cuts the paper and keeps the website.

Aftermath

Sugarscape.com continued as the brand's home, and the April 13, 2011 Sugar Beauty Special was the last printed artifact of the title; by 2013 Sugar existed only as the website.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →