Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2001–2013

STX became the world's fourth-largest shipbuilder, then its debt sank the whole group

South Korea's 19th-largest conglomerate expanded into shipbuilding at the top of the cycle — when orders dried up, creditors pulled the plug.

STX Group

What happened

STX Group grew from a renamed heavy-industries firm into South Korea's 19th-largest conglomerate in little over a decade. Its shipbuilding arm, STX Offshore & Shipbuilding, reached fourth place globally by 2009, and in 2007 the group bought Aker Yards, a major European shipbuilder, to go global.

The expansion was debt-funded, and the global shipping downturn that began in 2008 left STX with yards full of orders that were being cancelled and a balance sheet that could not absorb the losses. By 2013 the group faced a liquidity crisis. STX PanOcean, its shipping subsidiary, filed for court receivership in June 2013; the parent and other affiliates followed into restructuring.

State lenders Korea Development Bank and Korea Export-Import Bank absorbed large losses, and the collapse became a test case for South Korea's approach to corporate restructuring — regulators later created a dedicated 'bad bank' mechanism partly in response.

Why it happened

  • Shipbuilding is the most cyclical industry there is, and STX expanded capacity at the peak of the super-cycle.
  • The Aker Yards acquisition added European cost structures just as global demand fell.
  • Debt-funded growth left no margin for a downturn: when orders were cancelled, the group had no asset sales that could cover its obligations.
What it costgroup liquidated; state-bank lossescatastrophic

The lesson

In a cyclical industry, the worst time to lever up is when the cycle looks its best — capacity bought at the top is a fixed cost that outlasts the demand that justified it.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →