Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 1992–1997

Hanbo Steel's $6B collapse was the first domino in Korea's IMF crisis

The 14th-largest chaebol jumped 14 ranks in one year on bribed bank loans. When it fell in January 1997, three banks were downgraded and the crisis began.

Hanbo Steel · Korea First Bank

What happened

Hanbo Steel was South Korea's second-largest steelmaker and the core of the Hanbo conglomerate, which ranked 28th among Korean chaebol in 1994 and 14th a year later. The leap was funded by a massive steel plant begun in 1992, built almost entirely with high-interest bank loans. The loans were not obtained on merit: a court later found that Hanbo received illegal preferential treatment, with senior politicians and bankers pressured into approving credit that no commercial review would have justified.

On 28 January 1997, Hanbo Corp. entered receivership with an estimated $6 billion in losses. It was the first of at least ten major Korean conglomerate failures that year — Kia Motors and Daewoo followed. In February, Moody's downgraded three banks with heavy Hanbo exposure: Korea Exchange Bank, Korea First Bank, and Cho Hung Bank. International investors began pulling out. Interest rates rose. The domino effect contributed directly to the IMF's $60 billion bailout of South Korea later that year.

The political fallout was equally large. Founder Chung Tae Soo was sentenced to 15 years in prison for bribery, embezzlement and fraud. Eight other figures were jailed, including two former presidents of Korea First Bank and senior presidential aides. President Kim Young-sam's son was sentenced to three years. The scandal destroyed Kim's anti-corruption agenda and exposed the chaebol-banking-government nexus that had driven Korea's growth model for three decades.

Why it happened

  • The steel plant was funded by loans obtained through bribery rather than commercial assessment — the capital structure was criminal from the start
  • Jumping from 28th to 14th-largest chaebol in one year required leverage that no steel margin could service
  • Three banks held concentrated exposure to one borrower, so a single default triggered rating downgrades that rippled through the entire financial system
  • The government's implicit guarantee of chaebol debt meant nobody priced the risk — until the guarantee proved worthless
What it cost$6B losses; triggered IMF bailoutcatastrophic

The lesson

When a company's ranking rises faster than its revenue, the gap is leverage — and leverage obtained through corruption has no floor, because nobody in the chain is paid to stop.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →