Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Strategic decision · 2017–2025

Sigma-Tau raised an orphan drug 500x — regulators fined it €20.5M

Italian pharma Sigma-Tau (now Leadiant) raised the price of a lifesaving orphan drug from €0.28 to €140 per capsule, then fought regulators and lost.

Sigma-Tau (Leadiant Biosciences) · 2018-09

What happened

Sigma-Tau was founded in 1957 by research chemist Claudio Cavazza in Pomezia, Italy. It grew into a €697M pharmaceutical group with 1,900 employees, best known for discovering L-carnitine — one of the few Italian drugs to achieve worldwide acceptance and the second product ever to receive US orphan drug designation. By the 2010s, the company, renamed Leadiant Biosciences, held a monopoly on chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), a lifesaving orphan drug for cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX), a rare metabolic disease that causes progressive neurological damage.

Between 2016 and 2018, Leadiant withdrew its cheaper CDCA drug Xenbilox from the European market and replaced it with a new version, Leadiant CDCA, at a vastly higher price. The price rose from €0.28 per capsule to €140 per capsule — a 500-fold increase. The Italian NHS was charged approximately €15,000 per treatment. The company had a dominant position because it was the sole supplier of CDCA, and CTX patients had no alternative treatment.

The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) opened an investigation and in May 2022 fined Leadiant €3.5 million for abuse of dominant position under EU competition law. Leadiant appealed, but the fine was upheld by the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio in July 2023 and by Italy's Council of State in March 2024. The Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) separately fined Leadiant €17 million in 2025 for the same conduct in the Netherlands. The case reached the European Parliament, where MEPs questioned the company's pricing practices.

The fines forced Leadiant to reduce the price of CDCA for the Italian NHS. The case drew comparisons to Martin Shkreli's Turing Pharmaceuticals, though Leadiant's price increase was on a drug that had been available for decades. The scandal exposed a loophole in EU orphan drug regulation that allowed companies to obtain new market authorizations for old drugs and set prices without regard to the original cost of development.

Why it happened

  • Leadiant withdrew its cheaper CDCA drug from the market and replaced it with a new version at a 500x price increase, deliberately exploiting its monopoly on a drug CTX patients could not live without
  • The company fought the AGCM fine through two levels of appeal for nearly two years, prolonging the excessive pricing while patients and national health systems paid the inflated cost
  • Leadiant repeated the same pricing strategy in the Netherlands, where it was separately fined €17M, showing the price increase was a calculated global strategy rather than a single-market error
  • The company exploited a loophole in EU orphan drug regulation that let it obtain a new market authorization for an old drug and set a price disconnected from the original development cost
What it cost€20.5M in fines, price reduction, reputational damagecostly

The lesson

A monopoly on a lifesaving drug does not make every price legal. Regulators in three jurisdictions found the same conduct abusive, and the company paid over €20M across appeals.

Aftermath

Leadiant was forced to reduce the price of CDCA for the Italian NHS. The Dutch ACM fine of €17 million was upheld by the District Court of Rotterdam in February 2025. The case was debated in the European Parliament, contributing to broader scrutiny of orphan drug pricing in Europe. The company continues to operate as Leadiant Biosciences, but its reputation was permanently damaged by the comparison to Martin Shkreli and the coordinated regulatory action across multiple EU member states.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →