Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Sales & Retail · Strategic decision · 2021–2025

Sephora China's revenue shrank 40% from its peak — ¥1.5B in losses over four years

Once the dominant prestige beauty retailer in China, Sephora saw revenue fall from ¥10.9B to ¥6.5B and lost ¥1.5B over four years as 30+ exclusive brands left.

Sephora · LVMH · 2026-03

What happened

Sephora entered China in 2005 through a joint venture with Shanghai Jahwa, positioning itself as the gateway for prestige beauty brands. By 2021, revenue peaked at ¥10.9 billion — the undisputed leader in China's high-end beauty retail, with exclusive partnerships with nearly every major Western brand.

The decline began in 2022, when online beauty sales surpassed offline for the first time. Sephora's revenue fell to ¥8.5 billion and it posted its first-ever loss of ¥191 million. Over the next three years, the situation worsened: revenue dropped to ¥7.1 billion in 2024 with a ¥646 million loss, and to ¥6.5 billion in 2025 with a ¥499 million loss. The four-year cumulative loss reached ¥1.5 billion.

More than 30 exclusive brands left Sephora's shelves between 2022 and 2025, including many that launched their own direct-to-consumer channels on Tmall and Douyin. Meanwhile, domestic beauty retailers like THE COLORIST and HARMAY eroded foot traffic, and the rise of livestream e-commerce shifted beauty purchases away from physical stores entirely.

Sephora responded by introducing affordable Chinese brands and opening stores in lower-tier cities, but the pivot diluted its premium positioning. By 2025, revenue had shrunk 40% from its peak. Three CEOs came and went in 18 months, and LVMH's global CEO took over China operations directly.

Why it happened

  • Sephora's exclusivity model collapsed when prestige brands built their own DTC channels on Tmall, Douyin and JD.com, bypassing the retailer entirely.
  • The shift from offline to online beauty sales — China's online beauty market surpassed offline in 2023 — removed the need for a physical intermediary.
  • Livestream commerce and domestic beauty retailers offered lower prices and more engaging formats, pulling younger consumers away from Sephora's stores.
  • Sephora's response — adding cheap domestic brands and opening in lower-tier cities — undermined its premium positioning without winning price-sensitive shoppers.
What it cost¥1.5B in losses over four years; revenue down 40%costly

The lesson

A retailer whose only moat is brand exclusivity loses it the moment brands go direct-to-consumer.

Aftermath

Sephora China went through three CEOs in 18 months. LVMH's global CEO Guillaume Motte took over China operations directly in March 2025. The chain continues to operate over 300 stores in China but has not returned to profitability.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →