The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Operational decision · 1996–2009
The anesthesiologist who invented 21 clinical trials — and fooled Pfizer and Merck
Scott Reuben fabricated painkiller data for 12 years, inventing patients and forging co-authors. Pfizer and Merck paid him grants based on fake results.
Tufts University · Baystate Medical Center · 2010-02-21
What happened
Scott Reuben was a professor of anesthesiology and pain medicine at Tufts University and chief of acute pain at Baystate Medical Center in Massachusetts. He was considered one of the most influential researchers in pain management, publishing studies that shaped how doctors treated post-surgical pain. His work was cited in clinical guidelines and used to support drug approvals.
From 1996 to 2009, Reuben fabricated data in at least 21 journal articles. He claimed to have conducted clinical trials testing painkillers including Pfizer's Celebrex, Bextra, and Lyrica, and Merck's Vioxx. In reality, he never conducted the trials — in some cases he invented patients. He forged co-authors' names and wrote to the FDA urging them not to restrict drug use, citing his own fabricated data. Pfizer gave him five research grants between 2002 and 2007.
A routine audit in May 2008 revealed Reuben had not obtained approval for two studies. He admitted to fabricating data in March 2009. On February 21, 2010, he pleaded guilty to health care fraud. He was sentenced to six months in federal prison, ordered to pay $360,000 in restitution to pharmaceutical companies, and permanently debarred from FDA work. His medical license was permanently revoked in Massachusetts. Twenty-one papers were retracted.
Why it happened
- Reuben's research was never independently replicated — the field accepted results that always matched what drug companies wanted to hear.
- Drug companies funded his work and relied on it without verifying the underlying data existed, letting fabricated data reach regulators.
- The routine audit that caught him was about paperwork, not science — a decade of fraud went undetected because nobody checked if the trials had actually been run.
The lesson
When a researcher's results always confirm what the sponsor wants to hear, the absence of negative findings is itself a finding — the system that trusts data without verification is the enabler.
Aftermath
The Reuben case was described as 'the biggest case of fraud in the history of anesthesiology' and one of the longest-running academic frauds. It exposed how pharmaceutical companies funded and relied on fabricated clinical data. The case led to increased scrutiny of clinical trial registration and greater awareness of the need for independent verification of published research results.
Sources
- Wikipedia — Scott Reuben
- Scientific American — Medical Madoff: Anesthesiologist faked data for 15 years
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Physicist faked room-temp superconductivity — 5 retractions, thesis 21% plagiarized
Stanford president resigned over manipulated images — 5 papers retracted or corrected
Zantac was the world's bestselling heartburn drug — then it turned out to cause cancer
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.