The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025
SAS's pandemic emails made passengers cancel their own flights — and cost it 1M kroner
'We must adjust your flight', the emails said — 901 passengers then cancelled and lost their refund rights. Copenhagen City Court fined SAS 1M kroner.
SAS · 2025-11-11
What happened
Between March and May 2020, at the height of the pandemic, SAS sent emails to 18,201 customers saying the airline had to 'adjust and change' flight plans due to 'the current situation'. The messages acknowledged 'the impact this decision has', offered rebooking, and said SAS looked forward to welcoming the passenger on board again soon. Read together, the wording and structure told recipients one thing: their specific flight had already been cancelled. In fact it had not.
The distinction mattered in money. Believing SAS had cancelled their flights, 901 consumers cancelled their own trips and asked for refunds. Because the consumer had initiated the cancellation, SAS did not owe the full ticket price — holders of non-refundable tickets got back only taxes and fees. After consumer complaints, the Ombudsman reported SAS to the police in February 2022.
On 11 November 2025 the Copenhagen City Court fined SAS 1 million kroner for misleading marketing under sections 5 and 6 of the Marketing Practices Act. The fine was calculated under the pre-2022 penalty criteria; the stricter model introduced in January 2022 did not apply. SAS said during the proceedings that it had since refunded some of the affected consumers, and had 14 days to appeal to the High Court.
Why it happened
- The wording shifted agency: 'we must adjust your flight' reads as a decision already made — and the passenger's own click then surrendered the refund.
- Who cancels decides who pays: the emails moved 901 cancellations onto the consumer side, converting full-refund situations into taxes-and-fees payouts.
- The process outlasted the pandemic: complaints in 2020, a police report in February 2022, a court fine in November 2025.
The lesson
Words decide who cancels: tell customers their flight 'must be adjusted' and 901 will cancel it themselves — giving up the refund a real cancellation would have owed them.
Aftermath
The judgment of 11 November 2025 imposed the 1 million kroner fine under pre-2022 criteria. SAS stated it had refunded some affected consumers and could appeal within 14 days. The Consumer Ombudsman had reported the airline to the police in February 2022.
Sources
- Forbrugerombudsmanden: SAS ordered to pay 1 million kroner fine for misleading marketing (11 November 2025)
- Markedsføring: SAS idømt millionbøde for vildledende markedsføring (11 November 2025)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
KLM's 'big step' was 1% sustainable fuel — a Danish court called it greenwashing
SAS advertised that nothing is truly Scandinavian — then pulled the ad in a day
TV4 trailer for 'From' hid that the show needed a paid tier
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.