Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Operational decision · 1989–2015

The nutrition researcher who faked a study — then sued the journalists who exposed him

Ranjit Chandra fabricated infant formula and multivitamin studies, used a pseudonym to publish a confirming paper, and lost his Order of Canada.

Memorial University of Newfoundland · 2015-07

What happened

Ranjit Chandra was a professor of pediatrics at Memorial University of Newfoundland and a self-proclaimed 'father of nutritional immunology.' He was appointed to the Order of Canada in 1989 for his research on infant nutrition. His studies, funded by Ross Laboratories, Nestlé, and Mead Johnson, claimed that certain infant formulas could reduce allergies — findings that shaped the global infant formula market.

In 2001, Chandra published a study in the journal Nutrition claiming that his own multivitamin supplement, called 'Junior,' could reverse memory loss in elderly patients. In 2002, he published a confirming study — but under a pseudonym: 'Amrit L. Jain,' based on his sons' names. The fraud was exposed by a 2006 CBC documentary, 'The Secret Life of Dr. Chandra,' which found that the 1989 infant formula study had been fabricated and that the 2001 multivitamin study had never actually been conducted.

Chandra sued CBC for $10 million in damages. In July 2015, after a nine-week libel trial, the jury found that the CBC's allegations were true — Chandra had fabricated the data. He was ordered to pay $1.6 million in CBC's legal fees. The Order of Canada was revoked in December 2015, the first time membership was terminated for research fraud. An arrest warrant was issued in 2016 for defrauding OHIP of over $2 million. His medical license was revoked in 2018.

Why it happened

  • Chandra's reputation as a leading nutrition researcher and Order of Canada recipient shielded him from scrutiny — the 1994 university investigation was kept private and never acted upon.
  • The journals published the 2001 multivitamin study without verifying the data existed, and the confirming study under a pseudonym was never flagged as suspicious.
  • Memorial University refused to investigate the 2001 paper because Chandra had retired and left the country — the institution avoided accountability by claiming jurisdiction no longer applied.
What it cost$1.6M legal fees, Order of Canada revokedcostly

The lesson

A researcher who sues the journalists who expose him does not prove his innocence — he proves the system failed. The institution that investigated in 1994 and stayed silent is the accomplice.

Aftermath

The Chandra case was one of the most dramatic research fraud scandals in Canadian history. The libel trial established that the CBC's journalistic investigation was more thorough than the university's own inquiry. The revocation of the Order of Canada set a precedent for stripping national honors from researchers guilty of fraud. The case also highlighted the vulnerability of nutrition research to industry-funded bias.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →