The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2018
Prada sold 'fantasy' monkey charms with red lips — until a visitor walked past
Dec 2018: Pradamalia keychains at $550 in Prada's SoHo window; Chinyere Ezie's post, fresh from a blackface exhibit, forced them out of circulation.
Prada · 2018-12
What happened
Pradamalia was Prada's line of accessories characters — dark, monkey-like figures with oversized red lips, sold as a $280 leather card holder, a $550 keychain and a $750 mini-bag, with larger display versions staged through the SoHo store's windows. On December 13, 2018, Chinyere Ezie passed the storefront and posted on Facebook: 'I walked past Prada's Soho storefront only to be confronted with the very same racist and denigrating #blackface imagery' — she had just visited the Smithsonian's exhibit on blackface. Her post, calling for a boycott, drew thousands of reactions.
Prada's answer came the next day: 'Prada Group abhors racist imagery. The Pradamalia are fantasy charms composed of elements of the Prada oeuvre. They are imaginary creatures not intended to have any reference to the real world and certainly not blackface. We abhor all forms of racism and racist imagery. We will withdraw all of the characters in question from display and circulation.' The items came down from stores and the website. 'History cannot continue to repeat itself,' Ezie had written. 'Black America deserves better. And we demand better.'
What made the episode resonate was the gap between the two readings: a design studio's imaginary creatures, and a street-level image with a century of specific meaning behind it. The year had already brought H&M's 'coolest monkey in the jungle' hoodie; next came Gucci's balaclava sweater and Burberry's noose — Prada's withdrawal was the first of a season of pulled products, each one closed with an apology and a promise of internal change.
Why it happened
- The characters cleared every internal review as fantasy; nobody asked what dark skin and oversized red lips read as outside the design room.
- The display sat in a SoHo storefront — the most public possible placement — where a single passer-by could hold it against living history.
- Prada's defence — 'imaginary creatures not intended to have any reference to the real world' — conceded intent while the public judged the image.
The lesson
Calling creatures 'imaginary' does not survive one passer-by who has just seen a blackface exhibit — what a design means is decided on the street, not in the brief.
Aftermath
Prada withdrew the Pradamalia characters from display and circulation within a day and stood by its statement that they were never meant as blackface. Two months later Gucci pulled its balaclava sweater and promised global diversity actions; the season established the template — product down, apology out, programme promised — that fashion's later crises kept following.
Sources
- Prada is pulling monkey-like trinkets from stores after being accused of using 'blackface imagery' — Business Insider (Dec 14, 2018)
- Prada Removing Animal Charms Decried as Racist — The Hollywood Reporter (Dec 14, 2018)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Gucci sold a $890 'balaclava' with red lips — during Black History Month
Valentino's bag unit subcontracted to illegal workshops — a Milan court took it over
Loro Piana placed under court supervision for labour exploitation in Italian supply chain
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.