The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Operational decision · 2011–2018
PNB let SWIFT run outside its core banking system — and missed $2B over six years
A Mumbai branch issued Letters of Undertaking over SWIFT without recording them in the core banking system. Nobody reconciled the two for six years.
Punjab National Bank · Firestar Diamond International · 2018-02
What happened
Between 2011 and 2017, Punjab National Bank’s Fort branch in Mumbai issued Letters of Undertaking — guarantees that let a client borrow from other banks’ overseas branches — to a diamond and jewellery group. The LoUs went out over SWIFT, the international messaging network, and were never entered into the bank’s core banking system.
The two systems were not linked. SWIFT sent the message; the ledger never learned of it. So the guarantees did not appear in PNB’s books, did not consume the client’s credit limit, and did not show up in any reconciliation. Each expiring LoU was rolled over with a new one, which is why six years passed without the balance coming due.
It ended with one person looking. In January 2018 a PNB official queried a request that had no matching record in the core system, and the chain unwound. In February 2018 the bank disclosed roughly $2 billion of exposure — the largest fraud in Indian banking. The group behind the borrowing collapsed, its stores closed, and Indian authorities seized assets and pursued extradition proceedings that were still running in 2025.
PNB’s own controls had flagged nothing. The bank later linked SWIFT to the core system, and the Reserve Bank of India ordered every Indian bank to do the same by April 2018 — a control the industry had assumed was already in place.
Why it happened
- SWIFT and the core banking system were not connected, so a guarantee could be issued internationally and never appear on the bank’s own ledger
- Because the LoUs were invisible to the ledger, they consumed no credit limit and triggered no exposure alarm — the checks existed but had nothing to read
- Expiring guarantees were rolled into new ones, so nothing ever came due and forced a reconciliation
- The gap was found by an official querying a request by hand, not by any system — six years of automated controls had produced nothing
The lesson
A control in one system and not the other is not a control. PNB’s guarantees went out over SWIFT and never reached the ledger, so for six years its own books could not show what it owed.
Sources
- BBC News — 'Mehul Choksi: The diamond merchant wanted over $1.8bn India bank scam'
- Wikipedia — Nirav Modi
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Nirav Modi: A $4B banking fraud killed India's most glamorous luxury brand
Gitanjali Gems' empire of 4,000 stores was built on a $1.8B bank fraud
De Grisogono made jewels for celebrities — its shareholders' scandal made it toxic
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.