The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2013
Pistorius lost Nike, Oakley and Mugler within a week of his arrest
Within a week of the murder charge, Nike, Oakley and Mugler had all suspended or withdrawn — before any verdict.
Nike · Oakley · Thierry Mugler · M-Net · 2013-02-18
What happened
Oscar Pistorius, the double-amputee sprinter known as the 'Blade Runner', had become one of sport's most marketable figures, with a Nike deal thought to be worth about $2m a year and further contracts with BT, Thierry Mugler, Oakley and prosthetics maker Ossur. On 14 February 2013 police arrested him at his home in Pretoria on a murder charge over the death of Reeva Steenkamp; he was due in court the next day.
The sponsor exodus began before any verdict. On 18 February Nike said it had no plans to use him in future campaigns and pulled an internet advertisement, and Oakley announced it was suspending its contract with him with immediate effect. South African pay-TV channel M-Net pulled its campaign featuring him, tweeting it was removing 'our entire Oscar campaign featuring Oscar Pistorius with immediate effect'; Thierry Mugler withdrew all campaigns featuring him on 20 February; and on 21 February Nike suspended its contract with him, saying he 'should be afforded due process'.
The BBC's account of the week put a number on the loss: his deals with Nike, BT, Thierry Mugler, Oakley and Ossur were thought to have earned him several million pounds. BT declined to comment and Ossur called any decision on his future 'highly premature' — the two partners that did not move were the ones left holding the question.
Why it happened
- The sponsors repriced in days because the asset was reputation, not performance: a murder charge made every campaign featuring him unsellable, whatever the trial would later decide.
- Nike's two-step — no new campaigns on the 18th, suspension on the 21st — showed the safe order: stop first, formalise later, and let the statement do the distancing.
- The partners that hesitated were the ones left holding the question: BT stayed silent and Ossur called any decision 'highly premature', while the others had already answered it.
The lesson
Sponsorship is priced on reputation, not talent: within a week of the arrest every major partner had suspended or withdrawn, and the endorsements were gone before any verdict.
Aftermath
The contracts never came back. In September 2014 Pistorius was convicted of culpable homicide and began a five-year sentence; in December 2015 an appeal court changed the verdict to murder, ruling he had 'fired without having a rational or genuine fear that his life was in danger'; and in November 2017 the sentence was increased to 13 years and five months. A parole board approved his release in November 2023, and he was freed in January 2024.
Sources
- Pistorius charged with murder — BBC, 15 February 2013
- Nike, Oakley Pull Sponsorship of Oscar Pistorius — ABC News, 18 February 2013
- Pistorius sponsors keep distance — BBC News Business, 18 February 2013
- Nike suspends Pistorius contract — BBC News Business, 21 February 2013
- Oscar Pistorius released on parole 11 years after killing Reeva Steenkamp — BBC, 5 January 2024
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Bell Pottinger took a South African client — and UK's top PR firm went bankrupt in 2017
TV4 trailer for 'From' hid that the show needed a paid tier
Influencer Celina Blanche's CV-template TikTok hid its ad label behind 'more'
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.