Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Sales & Retail · Operational decision · 2023–2024

The Mulliez family sold Pimkie rather than save it — the court plan came two owners later

Fifty years of family-owned fashion, €196M in sales, and losses the owners stopped funding. Sold in 2023; the Lille court's continuation plan came in 2024.

Pimkie · 2024-10-30

What happened

Pimkie was the Mulliez family's fashion chain — the same northern-French dynasty behind Auchan, Leroy Merlin and Decathlon — selling young women's clothes from stores across France and beyond for half a century. By 2023 it was still doing €196 million in revenue and losing money the family no longer wanted to fund.

In February 2023 the Mulliez group sold Pimkie to a consortium — Lee Cooper France, sock maker Kindy and Turkey's Ibisler Tekstil — rather than finance another turnaround itself. The new owners inherited the restructuring: two job-protection plans, in March 2023 and January 2024, covering the closure of about 100 stores and nearly 500 jobs. By late July 2024 the chain was down to 154 stores and 1,300 employees, and it was back in court.

A safeguard procedure opened in May 2024; on 30 October the Lille Métropole commercial court approved a two-year continuation plan — Pimkie avoided liquidation, with projections suggesting liabilities could be cleared and profitability return from 2026. The brand survived because a court gave it time and a consortium gave it a use; what did not survive was the idea that a family fortune would underwrite a mid-market fashion chain indefinitely.

Why it happened

  • A family conglomerate owns fashion as a portfolio line; when the line loses, the rational move is sale, not subsidy — the owner's patience ended exactly where the losses did.
  • €196M of revenue on a shrinking store base is a cost problem wearing a sales costume; the two job-protection plans were the same cut done in instalments.
  • The continuation plan worked because the court could impose time the market would not give — profitability projected for 2026 is a legal artefact as much as a business one.
What it cost100 stores, 500 jobs, two planscostly

The lesson

An owner's patience is a line item with a limit — if the plan depends on a backer who can walk, price the walk; a court plan is not a strategy, it is what happens when the strategy runs out of owners.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →