The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 2008–2013
Opes Prime lent clients' shares twice and collapsed owing A$1 billion
A Melbourne stock lender counted clients' shares twice and on-lent them to cover big clients — when markets fell it owed A$1 billion and was gone in a week.
Opes Prime · 2008-03-27
What happened
Opes Prime was a Melbourne securities lender and stockbroker founded in 2003 by Laurie Emini and Julian Smith. Its business was stock financing: clients borrowed against the value of their share portfolios, and the loans were funded by two big lenders, ANZ and Merrill Lynch. The model looked simple and profitable, and by early 2008 the firm ran offices in Melbourne, Sydney and Singapore with about 80 staff. The flaw was what it did with clients' shares while the loans were outstanding — it used the same securities to cover margin shortfalls in other clients' accounts.
The accounting that made this possible was fictional in places. Court evidence later showed securities were recorded as held by more than one client at the same time on at least 13 occasions, with values exceeding $50 million, and client shares were moved through Riqueza Holdings, a BVI-registered vehicle controlled by the directors, to cover the margin calls of the firm's biggest client, Chris Murphy — whose accounts had a hole of about $116 million. When Australian shares fell sharply in early 2008, the lenders asked for their money back, and the double-counted collateral could not pay.
On 27 March 2008 Opes Prime went into administration, with Ferrier Hodgson appointed administrators and Deloitte appointed receivers for ANZ. Secured debt was believed to exceed $1 billion, of which about $650 million was owed to ANZ. The directors had also signed a $95 million loan with ANZ that amended the master securities lending agreement, removing ANZ's obligation to repay about $240 million in surplus value — a deal the sentencing judge later described as '$95 million of Monopoly money' returned for '$240 million in real dollars'. ASIC launched an investigation the next day.
The fallout ran for years. Creditors received just 37 cents in the dollar under a scheme approved in August 2009, and liquidators recovered $226 million from ANZ and Merrill Lynch; clients were left about $680 million out of pocket. Emini and fellow director Anthony Blumberg pleaded guilty in July 2011 to dishonesty charges — Emini got two years, Blumberg one — and both agreed to give evidence against Julian Smith, who was acquitted in September 2013. By early 2011 Emini was himself bankrupt, owing Opes Prime $6.38 million and holding $193.99 in his bank account.
Why it happened
- The same client shares secured multiple loans: securities were double-counted at least 13 times and moved through a director-controlled BVI vehicle to cover other clients' margin shortfalls.
- The whole model was a bet that share prices would keep rising — when the market fell in early 2008, ANZ and Merrill Lynch called in loans the collateral could not cover.
- The $95 million ANZ deal amended the lending agreement to wipe out a $240 million repayment obligation — the rescue preserved the bank's position at the expense of other creditors.
- Growth depended on two lenders' money: one business, one source of funding, so when the trigger was pulled the firm had no second line of defence.
The lesson
Securities lending works only while every share is one share. Opes Prime counted the same shares twice — when the market turned, the collateral had been spent before anyone asked for it.
Sources
- Wikipedia — Opes Prime
- The Age — Opes Prime founder bankrupt (2011)
- Sydney Morning Herald — Hole in finances 'hidden from ANZ' (2011)
- Sydney Morning Herald — Disgraced Opes Prime chief faces a year in jail (2011)
- The Age — Opes director 'saw opportunities' in share decline (2013)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
A ¥6.3B rescue couldn't stop a ¥23.7B writedown at China's mall giant
Gome's founder surrendered the company to a creditor for HK$377M
A 90-year-old department store has ¥137M cash against ¥3.9B of short-term debt
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.