Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2016–2017

Nike suspended its $70 million Sharapova bet within hours of her doping admission

An eight-year, $70 million endorsement was suspended in a day; two years of appeals later, Sharapova was back on court.

Nike · 2016-03-07

What happened

Maria Sharapova was the world's highest-paid female athlete for eleven straight years — she earned US$29.7 million in the year to June 2015, according to Forbes, most of it from endorsements. Her Nike contract, signed in 2010 for eight years, was worth US$70 million.

On 7 March 2016 Sharapova called a press conference to announce she had tested positive for meldonium at the Australian Open — a drug that had been added to the banned list two months earlier, which she said she had taken for a decade for health reasons. Nike suspended its relationship within hours: 'We are saddened and surprised by the news about Maria Sharapova. We have decided to suspend our relationship with Maria while the investigation continues.' TAG Heuer said it would not renew her contract; Porsche suspended its planned activities.

The suspension became the floor, not the ceiling. The ITF tribunal banned Sharapova for two years on 8 June 2016; the Court of Arbitration for Sport cut that to 15 months on 4 October 2016, accepting that she bore 'no significant fault or negligence'. She was eligible to return to the tour on 26 April 2017 — fifteen months after a single press conference had suspended the world's most expensive female-athlete endorsement.

Why it happened

  • The deal was a single-name bet: eleven years as the world's highest-paid female athlete made Sharapova the whole asset, so the moment her conduct was in question, the contract's value inverted.
  • Nike moved within hours because silence prices itself: every silent hour the market read the scandal as endorsed — the suspension was the only statement that cost nothing.
  • The legal case dragged the story out: a two-year ban announced in June, then a CAS ruling in October — each ruling was a fresh news cycle that kept the sponsors' distance justified.
What it cost8-year contract suspended; sponsors fledcostly

The lesson

A single-name bet is priced by the person's conduct: one press conference suspended Nike's eight-year Sharapova deal within hours. Price the exit before the entrance.

Aftermath

TAG Heuer declined to renew Sharapova's contract and Porsche suspended its planned activities within days. The ITF tribunal banned her for two years on 8 June 2016; the Court of Arbitration for Sport reduced the ban to 15 months on 4 October 2016, ruling that she bore no significant fault or negligence, and she was eligible to return on 26 April 2017.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →