Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Operational decision · 2017

Kobe Steel falsified quality data for 50 years — and the parts went into planes and cars

In 2017, Kobe Steel admitted falsifying quality data for aluminum and copper products for up to 50 years. Parts went into Boeing planes and Toyota cars.

Kobe Steel · 2017-10

What happened

In October 2017, Kobe Steel, one of Japan's largest steel and aluminum producers, admitted that it had been falsifying quality inspection data for aluminum, copper and steel products for up to 50 years. The falsified data made products appear to meet customer specifications when they did not.

The affected products were supplied to over 500 companies worldwide, including Boeing, Airbus, Toyota, Honda and General Motors. The parts were used in aircraft, automobiles, trains and other critical applications. The scope of the falsification — spanning five decades and hundreds of customers — was staggering.

Kobe Steel's stock fell 40% in the weeks following the admission. The case was part of a broader pattern of quality data falsification in Japanese manufacturing (Toshiba, Mitsubishi Materials, Toray). It damaged the reputation of 'Made in Japan' quality and prompted a re-examination of quality control practices across Japanese industry.

Why it happened

  • Kobe Steel falsified quality data for aluminum, copper and steel products for up to 50 years.
  • The affected products were supplied to 500+ companies including Boeing, Toyota and GM.
  • The falsification made products appear to meet specifications when they did not.
  • Kobe Steel's stock fell 40%; the case damaged 'Made in Japan' quality reputation.
What it cost50-year fraud; 500+ customers affected; stock fell 40%costly

The lesson

A quality system that reports what the customer wants to hear is a fiction department. Kobe Steel's falsification survived 50 years because the report was a deliverable, not a measurement.

Aftermath

Kobe Steel's president resigned. The company implemented new quality control procedures. The case prompted Japan's manufacturing industry to review quality inspection practices and contributed to a broader crisis of confidence in Japanese manufacturing quality.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →