Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2017-2025

Juewei underreported revenue for five years — China's 'duck neck king' got ST'd

The snack giant hid ¥700M in revenue over five years, was slapped with an ST warning and lost ¥50B in market cap

Juewei Food · 绝味食品 · 2025-09-23

What happened

Juewei Food, China's largest braised snack chain and the 'duck neck king' with over 15,000 stores at its peak, was caught systematically underreporting revenue from 2017 to 2021. The company failed to recognise franchise store renovation revenue in its annual reports, understating revenue by 5.48% in 2017, 3.79% in 2018, 2.20% in 2019, 2.39% in 2020 and 1.64% in 2021 — a total of roughly ¥700 million over five years.

On September 23, 2025, the CSRC's Hunan bureau imposed a special-treatment (ST) designation on the stock, restricting daily trading to a 5% limit. The company and its executives were fined a combined ¥8.5 million, with chairman Dai Wenjun personally fined ¥2 million. The financial crisis was compounded by a collapse in the core business: Juewei closed roughly 5,000 stores from its 2023 peak of 15,950, reported its first-ever annual loss in 2024 (¥191 million), and projected a further loss of up to ¥220 million for 2025. Market cap had fallen by roughly ¥50 billion from its peak.

Why it happened

  • The company chose to hide revenue rather than fix a deteriorating core business — a compliance failure that turned a commercial slowdown into a regulatory crisis
  • The ST designation froze the stock's liquidity and destroyed what remained of investor confidence, making recovery far harder
What it cost¥50B market cap loss; ST; ¥8.5M fine; 5K stores closedcostly

The lesson

A company that hides revenue when things are already going wrong is not protecting its shareholders — it is digging a hole that the ST designation will seal

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →