The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2020–2025
HP pushed a firmware update that bricked printers using non-HP ink — customers had no idea
A November 2020 'Dynamic Security' update silently blocked third-party cartridges. HP avoided damages, but had to make future lockout updates optional.
HP Inc. · 2020-11-01
What happened
In November 2020, HP pushed a firmware update to a range of LaserJet and OfficeJet printers that activated 'Dynamic Security' — a feature that rejects cartridges using non-HP chips, including compatible refills and remanufactured cartridges customers had already bought and were using without issue.
Owners who had installed the routine-looking update found their printers refusing ink they'd already paid for, with no clear warning beforehand that a firmware update would change what cartridges the machine would accept. Small businesses using budget cartridges were hit hardest, since Dynamic Security cartridges typically cost more than compatible alternatives.
A class action followed in the Northern District of California. In August 2024, HP settled: it agreed to make future firmware updates that add Dynamic Security restrictions optional for the affected printer models, and to keep disclosing when a cartridge-blocking measure is coming, rather than shipping it inside a routine update.
The settlement, approved in March 2025, paid no damages to the broader class — only $5,000 each to three named plaintiffs and $725,000 in attorneys' fees. HP avoided a payout, but the case established that a firmware update changing what hardware a device accepts needs to be disclosed and optional, not silent.
Why it happened
- HP shipped a firmware update that changed printer behavior toward a customer's existing, already-purchased ink without describing that change beforehand.
- Bundling a commercial restriction — which cartridges are accepted — inside what looked like a routine security update meant customers had no way to decline it based on its real effect.
- The restriction hit cost-sensitive small-business customers hardest, the segment most likely to use cheaper compatible cartridges and least likely to expect a printer update to change that.
- Avoiding disclosure saved HP nothing once litigated: the settlement forced the exact opt-in disclosure regime a clear notice at launch would have provided voluntarily.
The lesson
A firmware update restricting what a customer's own hardware can use is a commercial decision wearing a security label. Ship it undisclosed and a court will eventually force the disclosure anyway.
Sources
- Ars Technica — 'HP avoids monetary damages over bricked printers in class action settlement', March 2025
- Actionable Intelligence — 'Final Settlement Approved in Mobile Emergency's Firmware Class Action against HP', 19 March 2025
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Frigidaire's gas ranges delayed ignition long enough to build up gas
191,000 Aroeve air purifiers recalled after 37 overheating reports
Panasonic recalled 11,480 toaster ovens over an exposed power cord
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.