Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Marketing decision · 1974

Gerber sold adult food in baby jars — singles wanted nothing to do with it

Gerber Singles was adult food in baby jars. 'Meat mush' did not sell to college students in 1974.

Gerber (Gerber Products Company) · 1974

What happened

In 1974, Gerber — a company synonymous with baby food — launched 'Gerber Singles,' a line of single-serving, ready-to-eat foods packaged in the same glass jars used for baby food but aimed at adults. The target market was college students and young singles living alone. The tagline was: 'We were good for you then, we're good for you now.' The idea was that adults who had grown up on Gerber baby food would welcome the convenience of single-serving meals in familiar packaging.

The product flopped immediately. As Business Insider later summarised: 'Packages of meat mush didn't exactly scream cool to young singles.' The problem was twofold: first, the packaging was indistinguishable from baby food, making adults feel infantilised eating it; second, the product itself — pureed meat and vegetables — was unappealing compared to the frozen dinners and canned soups that were already available. Gerber Singles was discontinued within a year and is now remembered as one of the classic brand extension failures.

Why it happened

  • The packaging was identical to baby food jars — adults felt humiliated eating what looked like baby food in public or even at home
  • The product was pureed meat and vegetables — 'meat mush' — which had no appeal next to existing convenience foods like frozen dinners or canned soup
  • Gerber's brand equity was built entirely around babies — asking adults to eat from a baby food jar was a stretch too far, no matter how the label was worded
What it costDiscontinued within a yearembarrassing

The lesson

A strong brand is not permission to follow customers from one life stage to the next. If the packaging says 'baby' and the customer is an adult, the label is a liar.

Aftermath

Gerber Singles joined Colgate Kitchen Entrees and Bic disposable underwear in the brand extension hall of shame. Gerber refocused entirely on baby food and infant products, where its brand equity remained unshaken. The failure is cited in marketing textbooks as a case of brand overstretch: a company that dominates one category cannot assume its customers want the same experience in a different life stage.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →