The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Strategic decision · 1995–2023
Geox invented the breathing shoe — then lost its sole
Geox invented the breathing shoe after its founder burned his feet at a wine convention. By 2020, it was losing €128M a year and filing bankruptcy in Canada.
Geox · 2020-09-08
What happened
Mario Moretti Polegato was a vineyard owner from the Veneto region when he attended a wine convention in Reno, Nevada in 1993. He cut holes in the soles of his rubber-soled walking shoes to cool his burning feet — and realized he had invented a new type of footwear: breathable shoes with a perforated rubber sole protected by a waterproof membrane. He patented the idea and founded Geox in 1995.
The company grew explosively. The 'shoe that breathes' was a genuine product innovation, and Geox rode it to a stock market listing in 2004. At its peak, the company was worth over €1.5 billion. Geox expanded globally, opening stores in 100+ countries, and by 2011 had nearly 7,000 employees and over 1,100 mono-brand stores.
The decline was slow at first, then fast. The problem was the same as the invention: Geox had one trick. Competitors launched their own breathable technologies. The brand lost its premium positioning. Operating margins shrank from 17% in 2007 to near zero by 2015. The company tried diversification (apparel, sneakers) but nothing stuck.
The crisis hit in 2020. Geox filed for bankruptcy in Canada in September 2020. Full-year results showed a net loss of €128.2 million on revenue of €534.9 million. In July 2021 the company closed its factory in Vranje, Serbia, cutting 1,200 jobs. Founder Mario Moretti Polegato had stepped down as chairman in 2019. The company survived through restructuring but was a shadow of its former self.
Why it happened
- Geox had one product innovation — the breathable sole — and no second act. The patent expired, competitors copied the technology, and Geox had no answer beyond marginal improvements.
- The company expanded aggressively on the strength of the original idea, building a large store network and workforce that became a fixed-cost burden when the growth stopped.
- Diversification into apparel, sneakers and other categories diluted the core brand message without producing a successful new line.
- The founder's identity was so tied to the 'inventor CEO' story that the company struggled to define itself beyond that narrative.
The lesson
A single innovation can build a billion-dollar company. A single innovation cannot sustain one. Geox needed a second act — and never found it.
Aftermath
Geox survived the 2020 crisis through restructuring, debt renegotiation, and store closures. The company returned to positive EBITDA by 2022. However, the brand has never regained its former stature. The share price traded below €1 by 2023, down from a 2007 peak of nearly €10. The Vranje factory closure in 2021 eliminated 1,200 jobs. As of 2023, Geox had shrunk to around 2,800 employees and 600 stores globally.
Sources
- Geox — Wikipedia (Italian)
- Geox — Wikipedia (English)
- www.borsaitaliana.it
- Insolvency Insider Canada — Geox Canada Inc. files NOI (September 2020)
- www.lav.it
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Lululemon paused online sales of Get Low leggings after customers called them see-through
Valentino's bag unit subcontracted to illegal workshops — a Milan court took it over
Loro Piana placed under court supervision for labour exploitation in Italian supply chain
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.