Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 1984–2007

'Finanza, finanza e poi ancora finanza' — how Fila left Biella and came back Korean

The tennis brand born in Coggiola in 1911 was sold to a US fund in 2003, de-Biellized, then bought back by its own Korean licensee. Now the archive is home.

Fila

HearsayWidely repeated, and we cannot show you a document for it. Read it for the lesson, not as fact.

What it means today

When a brand trades as a balance-sheet item, watch who understands it as a business. Cerberus priced Fila as a fix-and-flip; its own licensee priced it as a future — and took it public two years later at double the issue price.

What happened

Fila was born in 1911 in Coggiola, in the pre-Alps above Biella — the Fila brothers' knitwear works, which in 1923 became the Maglificio Biellese with its headquarters on Viale Cesare Battisti in Biella. In 1973 came the great turn: colour on tennis whites, and Björn Borg wearing it. Then Vilas, Panatta, Sabatini, Seles and Becker; in skiing, Stenmark from 1974 and above all Alberto Tomba. By 1984 the company counted 500 employees, most of them in Biella — the year the finance arrived: Snia, chaired by Cesare Romiti, bought 80 percent.

Finance, finance and then more finance. In 1988 Gemina took Snia's share, at a moment when Fila turned over 90 billion lire and lost 3; in 1997 the holding Hdp inherited the textile portfolio — Fila, a line item in a media reorganization. Talks began in 2001 under Maurizio Romiti; the bill was 139.7 million euros of losses in 2001, 80.9 in 2002, and 295 million dollars of debt. On 8 March 2003 Hdp — by then Rcs MediaGroup — announced the sale to Sport Brands International, a newco of the American fund Cerberus: 351 million dollars, against 295 million of debt. The closing followed in June.

Under Cerberus it was sbiellesizzata — de-Biellized. The Italian headquarters moved to Milan; the Biella building stood empty from 2004. The fund cleaned the accounts, then put it back on the block. In 2005 Gene Yoon — the brand's Korean licensee since 1991 — bought Fila Korea for 127 million dollars; in January 2007 his company bought the rest — the worldwide rights — for about 350 million dollars. 'One of the first internationally renowned brands to be owned directly by a Korean company' — the deal's lawyers. In 1991 Biella had offered Yoon 45 percent of the venture; he could not afford it.

Fila Korea listed on the Kospi in September 2010, raising 99 million dollars, doubling on debut day; in 2011 it bought golf maker Acushnet for 1.23 billion dollars. It renamed itself Fila Holdings in 2020, Misto Holdings in 2025. The rimpianto got its answer: the foundation Yoon created in 2010 keeps the archive and the museum. In 2022 it bought back the old headquarters; in November 2025 it opened there the 8,200-square-metre Brand Experience Center. If in Biella only memories remained, in Korea the present smiles — and now the memories have come home too.

Why it happened

  • The brand passed from one holding to the next — Snia, Gemina, Hdp — each treating it as a line in a portfolio, until the losses made it a disposal.
  • The sale went to a fund whose stated craft was fixing distressed companies to resell them: Cerberus cleaned the accounts, de-Biellized the brand, and flipped it within four years.
  • The licensee saw what the owners did not: Yoon, offered 45 percent in 1991 without the money to take it, bought the whole brand in 2007 for about what the fund had paid.
What it costa century-old brand sold for the net of its debtcostly

The lesson

A brand can outlive its owners and still lose its home. Sold as a distressed asset, de-Biellized by the fund that flipped it, Fila was bought back by the licensee Biella had under-priced in 1991.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →