Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2008–2013

Final Fantasy XIV 1.0: the launch so bad Square Enix shut it down and rebuilt it

Square Enix's 2010 MMO launch was so broken the president apologized; servers shut in Nov 2012 and the game returned as A Realm Reborn in Aug 2013.

Square Enix · 2012-11-11

What happened

Final Fantasy XIV launched in September 2010 as Square Enix's flagship MMO, built on the confidence of the Final Fantasy brand and the success of FFXI. It was 'universally slammed as buggy, incomplete, and overall unplayable' — the biggest launch failure in Square Enix's history.

Two months after launch, producer Hiromichi Tanaka resigned and Naoki Yoshida took over; in December 2010, Square Enix president Yoichi Wada issued a formal apology, and the company later admitted the launch had 'greatly damaged' the Final Fantasy brand. Yoshida blamed arrogance: 'we're okay, it's the FF brand'.

On November 11, 2012, Square Enix shut the original version down, and on August 27, 2013 relaunched the game as Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn — a full rebuild. The failure cost two years of service and a complete redevelopment, but the reboot became one of the most successful MMOs in the world: the company that admitted its mistake recovered by paying for it twice.

Why it happened

  • The brand was the strategy: Square Enix shipped an unfinished MMO on the confidence that 'it's the FF brand, we made FF11 work' — the arrogance Yoshida named.
  • The launch had no quality gate: the game went out buggy and incomplete because the schedule answered to the brand, not to the product, and the market's verdict arrived within weeks of release.
  • The fix cost twice: the failure forced a full rebuild, two years of shutdown and a relaunch — Square Enix paid for the original mistake, then paid again to fix it.
What it cost1.0 shut down Nov 2012; full rebuild as ARRcostly

The lesson

The brand is not a quality gate: Square Enix shipped an unplayable MMO because it trusted the name, and the president's apology plus a full rebuild were the real cost.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →