The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Operational decision · 1946–1953
MIT fed radioactive cereal to disabled boys — and called it the Science Club
MIT and the AEC fed radioactive isotopes to disabled boys at Fernald. The boys were told they were in a 'Science Club.' Exposed in 1994. $1.85M settlement.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · Quaker Oats Company · 1994
What happened
The Walter E. Fernald State School in Waltham, Massachusetts was a state-run institution for mentally disabled children. Between 1946 and 1953, researchers from MIT and Harvard, funded by the US Atomic Energy Commission, conducted experiments in which disabled boys were fed radioactive iron and calcium mixed into their breakfast oatmeal and milk. The boys were told they were members of a special 'Science Club' that would give them extra food privileges. In the calcium study (1950-1953), 57 boys participated. In the iron study (1946), 17 subjects were involved.
The radioactive substances — iron-55, iron-59, and calcium-45 — were added to Quaker Oats cereal. The goal was to study how the body absorbs nutrients. The maximum radiation dose was later estimated at 330 millirem, which was claimed to be less than one year's background radiation in Denver. But the children were never told they were consuming radioactive material, and their parents were never asked for consent. The boys were institutionalized, mentally disabled, and unable to meaningfully consent on their own behalf.
The experiments were exposed in 1994 when the US Department of Energy declassified documents about Cold War-era human radiation experiments. The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments found the studies 'morally troubling' due to the lack of informed consent and the targeting of institutionalized children. In 1995, a class-action lawsuit was filed. The case settled in 1998 for $1.85 million from MIT and Quaker Oats. The Fernald experiments became one of the most cited cases in the broader US human radiation experiments scandal.
Why it happened
- The boys were mentally disabled children in a state institution — they could not meaningfully consent, and their parents were never told they were being fed radioactive material
- The 'Science Club' was a deception — children were offered extra food privileges in exchange for participating in experiments with no medical benefit and radioactive substances
- MIT and Quaker Oats used institutionalised disabled children as subjects for government-funded experiments, violating the Nuremberg Code's requirement for free and informed consent
The lesson
When researchers call radioactive feeding a 'Science Club' for disabled children, the name is not the problem — the research design is. Consent is not extra milk.
Aftermath
The Fernald experiments were part of the broader US human radiation experiments that included plutonium injections, whole-body irradiation, and other Cold War-era research. President Clinton established the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments in 1994, which documented the full scope. The committee's report led to the creation of the Office for Human Research Protections and contributed to the strengthening of informed consent requirements for federally funded research. The Fernald School closed in 2000.
Sources
- Wikipedia — Walter E. Fernald State School (1946-1953 experiments; MIT, AEC, Quaker Oats; 74 children fed radioactive iron and calcium; 'Science Club' deception; exposed 1994 via DOE declassification; $1.85M settlement 1998; Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments)
- Smithsonian Magazine — A Spoonful of Sugar Helps the Radioactive Oatmeal Go Down
- ACHRE Report — Chapter 7: The Studies at Fernald School (Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Physicist faked room-temp superconductivity — 5 retractions, thesis 21% plagiarized
Stanford president resigned over manipulated images — 5 papers retracted or corrected
Zantac was the world's bestselling heartburn drug — then it turned out to cause cancer
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.