Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025

Feiyu staged a luxury-bag flash sale — then faked the result to deny the winner

A secondhand-luxury livestreamer faked a flash-sale result to cancel the only winning order — fined ¥200,000 in Shanghai's first such enforcement.

Feiyu Network Technology (妃鱼网络) · 2025-01

What happened

Feiyu (妃鱼), founded in 2016, built China's biggest secondhand-luxury livestream business, raising nearly US$30 million in Series B funding in 2021 from N5Capital, Legend Capital and Matrix Partners China. Its model was simple: stream authenticated luxury goods on Taobao and Douyin, and let buyers compete in real time.

On 11 January 2024, Feiyu's Hangzhou branch ran a livestream flash sale for a red luxury handbag priced at ¥7,999, requiring buyers to compete by payment order. A single consumer won. The next day, Feiyu fabricated platform data to tell that buyer their order had not gone through, and pressed repeatedly for a refund. When the platform investigated, it confirmed the consumer was the sole valid purchaser.

In January 2025 the Baoshan District Market Supervision Administration fined Feiyu ¥200,000 for false marketing under the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. It was the first time Shanghai publicly penalised suspected fraud in luxury livestream selling — a signal that the category's grey zone of fake flash sales, phantom inventory and pressure tactics was on the regulator's list.

Why it happened

  • The flash sale was fabricated: Feiyu faked page information to reverse the result after a buyer had already paid.
  • The company blamed a rogue operations team member, but the regulator held the company liable — internal delegation does not transfer legal responsibility.
  • Shanghai's market regulators made the case a public benchmark: the first enforcement action naming luxury livestream fraud specifically.
  • The secondhand-luxury livestream category had grown fast without trust infrastructure — high prices, hard-to-verify authenticity and pressure tactics made it a regulatory target.
What it cost¥200,000 finecostly

The lesson

A livestream platform that fakes its own flash-sale results has no flash sale to sell — the urgency was the product, and the fraud was the cost.

Aftermath

Feiyu's brand director said the incident was an unauthorised act by a former operations team and that staff had been disciplined or dismissed, but media called the response unconvincing. The case was highlighted amid broader regulatory action: China's livestream sector drew 402,000 consumer complaints in 2024, up 19.3% year-on-year, and the market regulator published draft Livestream E-Commerce Supervision Measures in June 2025.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →