The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026
Energi+'s electricity ads skipped the monthly fee that lived in the fine print
Three products advertised without the DKK 33.34/month 'certification and service contribution'. Second police report for the utility, fined DKK 850k in 2024.
Energi+ · 2026-02-18
What happened
Energi+, a Danish electricity retailer formerly known as Grow Energy, marketed three products — Strøm+, Strøm+39 and Strøm+ Fastpris — with prices on its front page and campaign pages. One recurring cost never appeared next to them: a monthly 'certification and service contribution' of DKK 33.34. It surfaced only in the delivery terms and in a fee overview emailed after sign-up.
The Consumer Ombudsman took up the case in May 2025. Energi+ then added the fee to its sign-up page — but at the bottom, in a terms-and-conditions checkbox, still not beside the price information. That was not enough: under the Marketing Practices Act the price including all surcharges is material information, and hiding or omitting it is misleading. On 18 February 2026 the Ombudsman reported Energi+ to the police.
For Energi+ it was a repeat: in 2024 the company was fined DKK 850,000 for illegal telephone sales and misleading marketing, and its director personally fined DKK 200,000. The Ombudsman's position is blunt — consumers choosing between electricity products must see every fee up front, or their decision rests on the wrong price.
Why it happened
- The DKK 33.34 monthly fee was never shown beside the advertised prices — only in delivery terms and a post-sign-up email.
- Even after the Ombudsman intervened, the fee sat in a checkbox at the bottom of the sign-up page, still not beside the price.
- Repeat offence: Energi+ had already been fined DKK 850,000 in 2024 for misleading marketing.
The lesson
The total price is the ad: Energi+ hid a monthly fee in its terms, then buried it in a checkbox, earning a second police report on top of a DKK 850k fine.
Aftermath
The police report of 18 February 2026 concerned misleading price information under the Marketing Practices Act; the criminal outcome is for the courts. Energi+'s 2024 case had ended in a DKK 850,000 fine for the company and DKK 200,000 for its director.
Sources
- Forbrugerombudsmanden: Forbrugerombudsmanden politianmelder Energi+ for skjult gebyr (18 February 2026)
- BT: Forbrugerombudsmanden politianmelder Energi+ for skjult gebyr — har været i problemer før (18 February 2026)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Enly kept cold-calling and misleading after a DKK 700k fine — the name change didn't help
Three Swedish power sellers advertised discounts — not the price jump after year one
TV4 trailer for 'From' hid that the show needed a paid tier
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.