The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026
Elisa's crocodile 'bit' the prices — but never showed the 30-day low the law demands
Elisa's 'Haukatut hinnat' ads bit prices down — all discount impression, no 30-day lowest price shown. Finland's Market Court banned it, €50,000 fine.
Elisa · 2026-02-06
What happened
Finnish telecom Elisa built a campaign around a crocodile: 'Haukatut hinnat' — bitten prices — with price tags showing bite marks, a mascot called Hintagaattori, 'campaign price' labels and web addresses containing the Finnish word for sale. A print ad ran in Helsingin Sanomat in March 2024, a TV spot that September, and Black Friday banners in November ('Best Black Friday campaigns', 'Brightest device deals'). Together they told one story: prices had been cut.
What the story lacked was the anchor Finnish law has required since 1 January 2023: every announcement of a price reduction must show the lowest price applied to the product in the preceding 30 days — the EU's Omnibus rule against fake discounts. Elisa showed none. The Consumer Ombudsman took the case to the Market Court in June 2025, even though Elisa had already stopped the marketing.
In decision MAO:45/2026 of 6 February 2026 the Market Court ruled both campaigns unlawful: marketing that creates an impression of a discount counts as a price reduction announcement, with or without a stated before-price. It prohibited Elisa from using such expressions without the 30-day lowest price — excluding genuine loyalty offers — and attached a conditional fine of €50,000. It was the first Finnish precedent on what counts as discount marketing; voluntary compliance did not make the case moot.
Why it happened
- The visuals were the promise: bite marks and 'sale' URLs created a discount impression — and any such impression legally counts as announcing a price reduction.
- The 30-day rule is the point: since 2023 every price-cut announcement must display the lowest price of the prior 30 days — the anchor that keeps discounts honest.
- Stopping wasn't enough: the court judged the case anyway, citing public interest in consumer protection, and attached a €50,000 conditional fine to future variants.
The lesson
If an ad reads as a discount, the law treats it as one: bite marks and sale vibes still need the 30-day lowest price beside them — Finland's first discount-marketing precedent.
Aftermath
Elisa had already changed its pricing displays after talks with the Competition and Consumer Agency (KKV) in May 2025, but the court ruled on the merits. Leave to appeal was possible until 7 April 2026. In June 2026 the Market Court imposed a further €100,000 conditional fine on Elisa over loyalty-price marketing that also breached the lowest-price rule.
Sources
- Markkinaoikeus: decision MAO:45/2026, Consumer Ombudsman v. Elisa Oyj (6 February 2026)
- Ilta-Sanomat: Market Court condemned Elisa's campaign — €50,000 conditional fine (9 February 2026)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Doro's 'your parents' lives may depend on this button' ad ruled fear without reason
Tele2's 'free PlayStation 5' with 24-month broadband ruled misleading
Hallon's chatbot said phone support didn't exist — a Swedish court fined the answer
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.