Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2021

Danone's activist investors fired its CEO for caring more about the planet than profits

Emmanuel Faber turned Danone into the world's first listed B Corp, then lost his job when shareholders said it wasn't profitable enough.

Danone

What happened

Emmanuel Faber became CEO of Danone in 2014 and chairman in 2017. He steered the French food giant — maker of Activia yoghurt, Evian water, and Aptamil baby formula — toward a mission-driven model. Under his leadership, Danone became the first listed company to adopt 'société à mission' status under France's 2019 PACTE law, and in 2020 it was certified as a B Corporation. Faber's 'One Planet. One Health' strategy framed the company's purpose as improving the food system, not just selling products.

The sustainability pivot won plaudits from activists and academics, but some large shareholders saw it as a distraction from profitability. By late 2020, Danone's stock had underperformed its peers for years, and activist investors — first the small London fund Bluebell Capital, then the $60 billion US firm Artisan Partners — began calling for Faber's head. They argued that his dual role as chairman and CEO was a governance problem and that ESG commitments had been prioritised over returns.

On March 1, 2021, Danone's board decided to split the CEO and chairman roles, with Faber to stay as chairman. Two weeks later, it removed him entirely. The entire board resigned on July 29, 2021, after Faber argued in the press that the board had lost all credibility with shareholders. Interim chairman Gilles Schnepp led the search for a new CEO. The company later abandoned its revenue growth target and reorganized into a regional structure, effectively reversing Faber's strategic direction.

Faber's ouster became a symbol of the tension between purpose-driven capitalism and shareholder primacy. A year before his departure, shareholders had voted 99% in favour of the B Corp certification and climate plan. Faber told TIME that what happened was 'a few people that saw a window of opportunity.' The case is taught in business schools as a cautionary tale about governance, stakeholder theory, and the limits of CEO activism.

Why it happened

  • Faber's dual role as chairman and CEO gave activists a governance target, making his removal a process issue rather than a debate about sustainability.
  • The B Corp and mission certifications were approved by shareholders, but the market never priced their implications — when the stock lagged, ESG became the scapegoat.
  • Activist funds used a classic playbook: identify a governance weakness, gather support from quiet institutional investors, and present the board with a binary choice between the CEO and themselves.
  • Once the board split the roles, Faber's public criticism made his continued presence untenable — the board resigned rather than govern alongside a CEO who had lost faith in them.
What it costCEO ousted; B Corp strategy reversed; stock underperformedcostly

The lesson

A CEO building the company around stakeholder capitalism must keep the board aligned — when shareholders frame that mission as a cost, the governance structure becomes the target.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →